The statement that there are main five types of the stratification is false, because the stratification have mainly four types.
<h3>What is stratification?</h3>
Stratification means the enactment of screening or shortened the data, people, and objects into clear-cut groups or layers.
It is the technique that is used with the combination of another other data analysis tools. It means the categorization of the society on the basis of socioeconomic causes like wealth, income, race, education, etc.
There are mainly four stratification system that are slavery, estate systems, caste systems, and class systems.
Therefore, the given statement is false.
Learn more about the stratification, refer to:
brainly.com/question/5900661
Answer:
Sample response:
I. Introduction
A. Identifying the issue: the rising cost of a college education
B. Claim: investing in online education
II. Body paragraph
A. Plan of action: steps to open more online schools in the next four years
B. Evidence: data that shows how many students could earn a degree with this opportunity
III. Conclusion
A. Summary of my argument
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :)
A group leader who allows complete freedom for discussions and decisions, but participates in neither is a <span>laissez faire leader.</span>
<span>She can remember about seven items, with the number ranging from five to nine. The function of short term memory is to store bursts of information for a short duration of time. A phone number has seven digits, and that is a perfect example of the use of short term memory. People given a phone number can usually store it and recall it several minutes later, but in a week, they will forget.</span>
The corporations and unions have been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010 because the Supreme Court ruled that campaign spending is a protected form of free speech.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Supreme Court in its judgement of a 2010 case fought between the parties 'Citizen United' and the 'Federal Election Commission' clarified that the expenditure made by a political party to communicate with its subjects forms an integral part of their freedom of speech and hence their spending on election campaigns cannot be capped by law.
