9514 1404 393
Answer:
-25 dollars per month
Step-by-step explanation:
It is convenient to compute the rate of change using points where the graph crosses grid intersections. A couple of these are ...
(months, dollars) = (1, 675) and (4, 600)
Using the slope formula, we have ...
m = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)
m = (600 -675)/(4 -1) = -75/3 = -25 . . . . . dollars/month
The answer is 12ft. Because if 1in is 3ft then 4in will be 4 multiplied by 3
Answer:Put this in y= mx +b form
we have the slope(4) as well as a set of points for x and y so we have everything we need to solve for b
1= 4(2) + b
1 =8+b B=-7
so equation is y = 4x -7
Step-by-step explanation: can i get brainley? :)
Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.
Isosceles Triangle.
Hope this helps! :)
