NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Naddika [18.5K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: B. 16

Step-by-step explanation:

1,536/6=256

256 squared=16

Marysya12 [62]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

B. 16

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to work on the equation backwards. You know the answer, but you don’t know x. first, you divide 1536 by 6. you will get 256. next, you find the square root of 256. the square root of 256 is 16, so the answer is 16 :)

You might be interested in

The machine bottled 8,000 bottles in 4 hours. if the rate of the machine were doubled, how long would it take the machine to bot

valina [46]

It would take 20 hours since 8,000 times 5 is 40,000 so 4 times 5 is 20.

Logic.

4 0

3 years ago

Let X1, . . . ,Xn ∈ R be independent random variables with a common CDF F0. Let Fn be their ECDF and let F be any CDF. If F = Fn

Georgia [21]

Answer:

See the proof below.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to proof that: Let $X_1, X_2, ...X_n \in R$ be independent random variables with a common CDF $F_0$ . Let $F_n$ be their ECDF and let F any CDF. If $F \neq F_n$ then $L(F)$

Proof

Let $z_a$ different values in the set { $X_1,X_2,...,X_n}$ } and we can assume that $n_j \geq 1$ represent the number of $X_i$ that are equal to $z_j$ .

We can define $p_j = F(z_j) +F(z_j-)$ and assuming the probability $\hat p_j = \frac{n_j}{n}$ .

For the case when $p_j =0$ for any $j=1,....,m$ then we have that the $L(F) =0< L(F_n)$

And for the case when all $p_j >0$ and for at least one $p_j \neq \hat p_j$ we know that $log(x) \leq x-1$ for all the possible values $x>0$ . So then we can define the following ratio like this: