Answer:
Letter a. is correct. <u>TRUE.</u>
Explanation:
This statement is correct because a supply chain is part of the macroenvironment, and operational risk can be defined as different results than expected due to internal or external events.
The current economic scenario appears to be unstable, as political, economic, technological, social and other changes are occurring all the time, which can represent significant external risks in a supply chain, where there is no control by the buyer or supplier.
Some examples of uncontrollable operational risks are:
- Fraud and misconduct;
- Systemic failure;
- Safety;
- Human error.
For this reason, the importance of risk management, which includes planning, identification, qualitative and quantitative analysis, response planning and monitoring and control processes, which together will provide subsidies for less vulnerability in the supply chain and less risk.
Access control tecnology. it's the only thing i can come up with, hope it's right
Answer and Explanation:
The matching is as follows:
1. Cash receipts journal - since cash is received
2. General journal - since the items is returned
3. Purchase journal - since purchase is done
4. Purchase journal - since purchase is done
5. Cash disbursement journal - since cash is paid
6. Cash disbursement journal - since cash is paid
7. Purchase journal - since purchase is done
8. General journal - since expenses are recorded
9. General journal - since the items is returned
10. Cash receipts journal - since cash is received
Answer:
B) the uneven distribution of gains and losses from free trade.
Explanation:
One of the most important reasons why governments impose trade barriers is to protect domestic jobs (and domestic industries). We are part of a society (country), and society's most important component is people, not money. Generally the economic gains of free trade are larger than the economic losses, but the economic losses hurt the most.
Imagine if no trade barriers actually existed, how many millions of jobs would be lost in the US. Trade barriers are nothing new, the current president didn't invent them. He just incinerated them.
How does a leader tell the people that 10 or 20 million must lose their jobs and probably will not be able to find any similar jobs in the future just because the rest of society will benefit from cheaper products. The lives of 20 million households (50-80 million people) would be destroyed, while 280 million people would benefit.
The amount of harm done to the people that lose their jobs is much greater than any individual benefit.
