"Going through all of that effort was worth it!"
Answer:
The anti-slavery movement grew from peaceful origins after the American Revolution to a Civil War, or War Between the States, that effectively ended slavery while severely damaging the women's rights movement. ... The women's rights movement was the offspring of abolition. Many people actively supported both reforms.
Difference-One of the first would be the Abolitionist Movement to abolish slavery. ... The Abolition movement focused on granting slaves their freedom. However, it also hoped to end social discrimination and segregation between people of white and black color. The Women's Rights movement fought to provide women the right to vote
They are re-elected precisely because they have a low approval rating. They are re-elected to prevent them from establishing long lasting legacies and being members forever or from passing it on to their children or anything similar. If you don't approve of them then you re-elect them so someone else can try to do something better.
Answer:
Central Australia, also known as the Alice Springs Region, is one of the five regions in the Northern Territory of Australia.
Hope this helped! :)
Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
