The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not provide any menu to see the options, we can say the following.
Different sources are aimed at different audiences. Sometimes a source can be directed at more than a single group of people. Documentary films are usually aimed at the general population across the globe. Some sources may have a very specific audience. A literary journal can be specifically aimed at students or scholars with a background in literature.
It all depends on the kind of audience or reader. It is very important that the author defines its audience and then try to collect the kind of correct source to support the information the author is about to share.
Many times documentaries are aimed at general audiences in order to create some kind of awareness about an issue. But in the case of a literary or scientific journal can be specifically aimed at students, researchers, or scholars with a background in those subjects. It is a specialized publication.
75 percent disease 25 percent indians
This depends on the system, the kind of information they need, etc...
In the most democratic countries, government sites might prove most reliable. In other, independent journalists might be better. In a way, it's almost impossible to be sure your information isn't biased.... the best is if you know who wrote it and what their agenda is: if they news is left-wing and what they report is not very left-wing, then it's perhaps reliable.
Answer: Because they had never developed immunities to the disease
Answer:songhai is similar to Ethiopia because the fact that they were both powerful in their own way. They both really expanded the empire, had incredible rulers, and were very skilled at controlling their armies. hope this helps
