I do think khan helps you, just not the right help. Most students do Khan simply because they have to. A lot of times this makes for a bad education. Sometimes they just don't do it at all. Khan shows you what to do, but it dose not seem to help anyone. I get a lot of complaints about how the teacher adds to many but even more so, khan is not helping them learn. It will give you hints but then it marks that question wrong. So in the end I guess you could say no I don't agree with Khan's claim regarding the goal of education.
칸이 당신을 돕고 있다고 생각하지만 올바른 도움이 아닙니다. 대부분의 학생들은 필요한 이유만으로 Khan을 연기합니다. 많은 경우 이것은 나쁜 교육을 만듭니다. 때때로 그들은 그것을 전혀하지 않습니다. Khan에게 무엇을해야하는지 보여 주지만 누구에게도 도움이되지 않는 것 같습니다. 선생님이 그렇게 많은 사람들을 어떻게 추가했는지에 대해 많은 불평을 받고 있지만 더구나 칸은 그들이 배우는 것을 돕지 않습니다. 힌트를 제공하지만 질문이 잘못되었음을 나타냅니다. 그래서 결국 저는 교육 목표에 대한 칸의 주장에 동의하지 않는다고 말할 수 있다고 생각합니다.
Ran is the verb in the sentence
awnser D all of the above
In "The Train From Rhodesia", the young woman carries around a great deal of shame that can be attributed to a certain specific situation. Her husband has given her an item made by a native artist as a gift. The little amount he paid for it makes the husband proud, but it has the opposite effect on the young woman. She feels like she's being an accomplice of the poor treatment of the artist, who is only accepting the low price and selling-off his work short, out of sheer necessity. The situation makes her feel like she's wrongfully taking advantage of someone.
Hope this helps!
