1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Molodets [167]
3 years ago
5

What is the product of 9 radical 5 and 5 radical 10 in simplest radical form?

Mathematics
1 answer:
tatuchka [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(9√5)   (5√10)

The leading interger product is found by multiplying 9 and 5

The leading integer product is 9*5 = 45

The radical product is (√5*10

Factor 10

radical product = √5*2*5

There are 2 fives underneath the radical. Take one out and ignore the other

radical product = 5√2

The 5 now multiplies by 45 and √2 becomes part of the answer

5*45√2

225√2

You might be interested in
A. Economic theory describes the relationship between inflation and unemployment as:
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

1: The correction option is B) Negative

Explanation

In economic theory, the Philips curve depicts the relationship between unemployment and inflation as a negative one. In order words, when inflation goes up, unemployment reduces.

The logic behind that thinking is, that inflation, which is the general increase in prices of goods/commodities and services is good for business. Business owners are quick to adjust to higher prices regardless of how it is induced and sometimes even profit from it in sectors not affected by inflation. So in such sectors, as business improves,  it is assumed that there is a requirement to being in more hands to help with the expansion of the business.

2. The correct option is B) Holds for certain time periods

Explanation

Social scientists and researchers have plotted the data across various periods (20 years) using data from the US economy.

The following results emerged:

  • the traditional relationship between inflation and unemployment held in 2001 during the mild recession triggered by the 9/11 situation. Unemployment took an upward spiral averaging an increase of 6% while inflation nosedived by 2.5%;
  • Another snapshot was taken in the mid-2000s. This time unemployment went belly-up by several degrees, while inflation took off in the opposite direction by almost 5% before receding in 2006 when unemployment bottomed;
  • In another analysis, the consumer price index took a steep downward dive during the Great Recession. This time, unemployment took a bullish charge, going up as much as 10%
  • This negative relationship failed to hold between 2012 to 2015. Both factors developed a positive relationship and moved in the same direction;
  • There has also been a loss of strength in the negative relationship as also seen in recent times. Specifically, between 2016 to 2019 where unemployment has steadily receded to 50-year lows, with inflation remained steady at an average of 2%.  

So the correct answer is B.

3. The correct answer is True:

Explanation

As seen from the analysis above, the negative relationship remains largely true for most of the periods examined. Hence it is more pragmatic to expect a dip in unemployment whenever there is a spike in the CPI.

Cheers

6 0
3 years ago
Factor completely 3x2 − 11x 8. (x 4)(3x − 2) (x − 2)(3x − 4) (x 1)(3x − 8) (x − 1)(3x − 8).
earnstyle [38]

The factors of the equation 3x^{2} -11x+8 will be (3x-8)(x-1)

<h3>What will be the factors of the given equation?</h3>

When we split the equation into two groups we will get

3x^{2} -3x-8x+8

3x(x-1)-8(x-1)

Now taking (x-1) common

(3x-8)(x-1)

Thus the factors of the equation 3x^{2} -11x+8 will be (3x-8)(x-1)

To know more about the factors of quadratic equation follow

brainly.com/question/1214333

3 0
2 years ago
Adam works at a bakery. He uses 1/8 of his flour supply to make bread and 3/4 of his flour supply to make other baked goods. If
kykrilka [37]

Answer: B  

he has 24 in his supply!

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A data scientist studying a manufacturing process classifies each item produced by the process as either Poor, Acceptable, or Ex
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

0.214 ; 0.064 ; 0.3859 ; 0.9966 ; 0.135

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the distribution :

Poor ___ Acceptable ____ Excellent

0.25 _____ 0.6 _________ 0.15

The data scientist receives three items produced by the manufacturing process.

Find the chance that:

a. all of items are Acceptable

0.6 * 0.6 * 0.6 = 0.6^3 = 0.214

b. none of the items is Acceptable

P(not acceptable) = 1 - p(acceptable) = 1 - 0.6 = 0.4

0.4 * 0.4 * 0.4 = 0.4^3 = 0.064

c. at least one of the items is Excellent

P(atleast one) = 1 - P(none)

P(not excellent) = 1 - 0.15 = 0.85

P(none is excellent) = 0.85^3 = 0.614125

Hence,

P(atleast one is excellent) = 1 - 0.614125 = 0.3859

d. not all of the items are Excellent

P(not all) = 1 - p(All)

P(all excellent) = 0.15^3 = 0.003375

P(not all are excellent) = 1 - 0.003375 = 0.9966

e. there is one item of each class:

P(poor) * p(acceptable) * p(excellent) * (number of classes)!

0.25 * 0.6 * 0.15 * 3!

= 0.135

3 0
3 years ago
Un apostador pierde en su primer juego el 30% de su dinero, en el segundo juego pierde el 50% de lo que perdió; finalmente en el
sergiy2304 [10]

Responder:

26,62

Explicación paso a paso:

Sea x el dinero original que tenía el jugador:

si un jugador pierde en su primer juego el 30% de su dinero, la cantidad perdida será;

= 30/100 \ of \ x\\= 0.3x

Si en el segundo juego pierde el 50% de lo que perdió, entonces la cantidad perdida en el segundo juego será:

= 50/100 \ of \ 0.3x\\= 0.5 \times 0.3x\\= 0.15x

Si en el tercer juego pierde el 40% de todo lo que ha perdido, la cantidad perdida en el tercer juego será:

=\frac{40}{100} \ of \ (0.3x+0.15x) \\= 0.4(0.45x)\\= 0.2025x

Si la cantidad que le queda para seguir apostando es de 37 soles, entonces para calcular la cantidad original que tiene, sumaremos toda la cantidad perdida y la cantidad restante y equipararemos la cantidad original x como se muestra:

0,3x + 0,15x + 0,2025x + 37 = x

0,6525x + 37 = x

x-0,6525x = 37

0,3475x = 37

x = 37 / 0,3475

x = 106,48

La cantidad que tenía originalmente era de 106,48

75% de 106,48

= 75/100 * 106,48

= 0,75 * 106,48

= 79,86

Tomando la diferencia entre su monto original y su 75% será:

= 106.48-79.86\\= 26.62

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Round 13.045 to the nearest whole number.
    12·2 answers
  • What is 6,372,079,003 in word form
    5·1 answer
  • Find the LCM of the numbers using prime factorizations<br> 6,12,14
    7·2 answers
  • What fraction is equivalent to 23/30
    5·1 answer
  • Vectors; please help: 2y+w-u=?
    9·1 answer
  • Steven wakes up at 5:20. It takes him 3/4 of an hour to shower,get dressed,and comb his hair. It takes him 1/2 hour to eat break
    11·2 answers
  • I’m stuck on this problem<br> Pls help ASAP
    13·2 answers
  • To the nearest tenth, what is the area of the shaded segment when JA = 8 ft?
    5·1 answer
  • need help on number 7
    12·1 answer
  • How long is 10 percentage of 60 minutes?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!