Answer:
2 4
Explanation:
protein and vitamins are essential for a healthy diet
Answer:
Re chief was a leaders of war and a white chief served on a councilto help make decisions for the broble
Explanation:
They led power over their families ",participatedin government , and fought in wars
Answer:
Reasonable doubt standard.
Explanation:
The single most important criterion for determining the level of proof necessary for conviction in criminal trials is Reasonable doubt standard.
Reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof need to court. It must be exceeded to to prove a convict in a criminal case. It is exclusively used in criminal cases only as the stakes are very high.
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
<span>The story of Andrew Carnegie is an example of an extreme case of Philanthropic Acts. He was a Scottish-American industrialist that paved the way for the expansion of the American steel industry during the 19th century. He gave almost 90% of his fortune to charities, foundations, and universities because he believed the wealth is something to be used for the improvement not only of himself but of society. </span>
