All categories

2 years ago

Find the volume of the cylinder. Use 3.14 for π. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Maurinko [17]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

409.77 is the answer!

Step-by-step explanation:

3 x 3 x 3.14 x 14.5

pie x r^2 x h = V

lutik1710 [3]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The volume of the cylinder is 410 ft^3

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the volume, we must know the formula. The formula is, V = π r^2 h. We already know that the diameter is 6ft, so we have to cut that in half to get the radius. 6/2 = 3. The radius is 3ft. Now we can plug in the values.

V = π*3^2*14.5

V = π*9*14.5

V = 409.977841

V = 410.0

You might be interested in

What percent is 45 out of 72?

Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

62.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Does anyone know this?!

ale4655 [162]

Answer:

i think b

Step-by-step explanation:

tell me if im wrong

4 0

3 years ago

Which expressions are equivalent to 2^−4·2^2?

Ede4ka [16]

Answer: the answer is 6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Because $2x^{-4}$ . $2x^{2}$ = $2x^{-4+2}$ = $2x^{-2}$

I hope it right

5 0

3 years ago

Elena compró 34 de kilogramos de manzanas, 12 kilogramo de mangos y 2 kilogramos de naranjas. ¿Cuántos kilogramos de fruta compr

Oduvanchick [21]

Answer: 48 kilogramos de fruta

Step-by-step explanation:

Hola, para resolver este problema simplemente hay que sumar las cantidades de cada fruta:

Kilos de manzanas + kilos de mangos+ kilos de naranjas:

Matemáticamente hablando:

34+12+2 = 48 kg

Elena compro 48 kilogramos de fruta en total.

Si quedo alguna duda no dudes consultar con un comentario.

5 0

3 years ago

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

$m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}$

Where:

$S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}$

$S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}$

$\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}$

$\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}$

And we can find the intercept using this:

$b=\bar y -m \bar x$

And the model obtained for this case is:

$y = -3.4 +5.2 x$

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0

3 years ago