<h2>Answer:</h2>
The most important six ways to learn employee how much the organizational culture is important are;
- Goals and Values
- Performance
- Language
- History
- Politics
- People
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
Each of the above areas is important to get socialize in the organization and each step leads towards the organizational commitment and commitment with the performance.
<h3>Goals and Values: </h3>
Adopt the values and goals which are spoken and unspoken in an organization. Until you don't learn the goals, it is difficult to reach the target given by the company.
<h3>Performance:</h3>
Performance proficiency is very important to know. It describes the role and works description of the employee.
<h3>Language: </h3>
Every organization has its own slogans and slang, short names or abbreviations. So it is must to learn the organizational language.
<h3>History: </h3>
It is important to know about the organizational traditions, rituals, customs, and myths.
<h3>Politics: </h3>
Organization politics is one of the major factors which must be learned by every employee. It is the formal and informal way of work and work structure within an organization.
<h3>People:</h3>
Being social and keep good relations with co-workers is very important to be a productive worker within an organization. Sooner the employee socializes himself sooner he becomes an efficient worker.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
The answer that best completes the statement above is POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT IN OPERANT CONDITIONING. From the term itself operant conditioning, this is when behavior is being controlled or influenced by a certain consequence. Operant conditioning can be of different types such as positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment. In Jennifer's case, this can be classified as positive reinforcement since the stimulus being used encourages her to do the same action again in the future.
Answer:
The Gadsden Purchase is a 29,670-square-mile region of present-day southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico that the United States acquired from Mexico by the Treaty of Mesilla, which took effect on June 8, 1854
Explanation:
Gadsden's Purchase provided the land necessary for a southern transcontinental railroad and attempted to resolve conflicts that lingered after the Mexican-American War. ... In 1853, Mexican officials evicted Americans from their property in the disputed Mesilla Valley
