Answer:
What law are you addressing??
<3 Todo
Explanation:
<span>He found that families are, in fact, a universal across cultures. Every culture in the world, even those that were considered outside the normal white Anglo bounds of civilization, seemed to have family structures that were similar to ours. This showed that there is some sort of inborn tendency for people to gravitate to families.</span>
The deputy governor can interpret the law, determine its constitutionality and apply it to individual cases in the supreme court.
<h3>
What is a Supreme court?</h3>
- The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States.
- It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court actions and state court actions, including points of federal law.
- It also has its own jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, in particular "all cases involving ambassadors, other ministers of public service and consuls, and cases in which a State is said to be a party."
- The Court has powers of judicial review and has the power to find laws that violate any provision of the Constitution.
- It can also revoke executive orders that violate the Constitution or applicable law.
- However, it may only act in connection with matters within the area of law for which it has jurisdiction.
- The courts have ruled that they can adjudicate cases that have political implications, but that they have no authority to adjudicate unjustifiable political issues.
Thus, the deputy governor can interrupt the case in between and can appeal in the supreme court.
To know more about supreme court refer to:
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
The nature of democracy is that elected officials are accountable to the people, and they must return to the voters at prescribed intervals to seek their mandate to continue in office. For that reason most democratic constitutions provide that elections are held at fixed regular intervals.
On the opposition of racial integration of public places the members of congress who signed the southern manifesto on integration argue that the supreme court's opinion in the brown case in 1954 was invalid.
When the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, the Manifesto was written as a response. Among the Jim Crow laws that governed the Southern United States at the time, school segregation policies were among the longest-lasting and best-known.
19 US senators and 82 southern representatives all signed the manifesto. The whole Congressional delegations were signatories.
To learn more about southern manifesto here
brainly.com/question/13739912
#SPJ4
