Complete question:
Consider the game of chicken. Two players drive their cars down the center of the road directly at each other. Each player chooses SWERVE or STAY. Staying wins you the admiration of your peers (a big payoff) only if the other player swerves. Swerving loses face if the other player stays. However, clearly, the worst output is for both players to stay! Specifically, consider the following payouts. Player two Stay swervePlayer one stay -6 -6 2 -2 swerve -2 2 1 1
a) Does either player have a dominant strategy?
b) Suppose that Player B has adopted the strategy of Staying 1/5 of the time and swerving 4/5 of the time. Show that Player A is indifferent between swerving
and staying.
c) If both player A and Player B use this probability mix, what is the chance that they crash?
Explanation:
a. There is no dominant strategy for either player. Suppose two players agree to live. Then the best answer for the player is to swerve(-6 versus -2). Yet if the player turns two, the player will remain one (2 vs 1).
b. Player B must be shown to be indifferent among swerving and staying if it implements a policy (stay= 1⁄4, swerving= 5/4).
When we quantify a predicted award on the stay / swerving of Player A, we get
E(stay)= (1/5)(-6)+ (4/5)(2)= 2/5 E(swerve)= (1/5)(-2)
c. They both remain 1/5 of the time. The risk of a crash (rest, stay) is therefore (1/5)(1/5)= 1/25= 4%
Answer:
quality of life
Explanation:
The consumers have the right to have an influence on products and marketing that will help with the quality of life. This leds to proposals that are related to this right that look to avoid a big amount of messages in an advertising that distract from the main idea and to be informed about the materials or ingredients used in goods. According to this, the answer is that proposals related to quality of life include controlling the ingredients that go into certain products and packaging as well as reducing the level of advertising "noise."
<span>This is called a brand. This helps a company distinguish itself from other companies and in some circumstances, a brand might make the product more appealing to the customer by adding a certain personality to it. This helps the consumer relate to the product more.</span>
Answer:
- Adjusted Cost of Goods sold = $1,206,860
- Adjusted Retained Earnings = $4,675,190
Explanation:
An overstated opening inventory would overstate Cost of Goods sold. The overstatement should therefore be removed from the Cost of goods sold.
An overstated closing inventory would understate Cost of Goods sold. The overstatement should therefore be added to the Cost of Goods sold.
Adjusted Cost of Goods sold 2020 = Cost of Goods sold + 2020 ending inventory - 2019 opening inventory
= 1,290,700 + 32,910 - 116,750
= $1,206,860
Adjusted Retained earnings
The retained earnings would have to be adjusted for the overstatement of the current inventory by $32,910 because this understated Cost of Goods sold.
= Retained earnings - Overstatement of inventory
= 4,708,100 - 32,910
= $4,675,190
<span>their primary difference can be defined as two companies that have different : business models
Amazon provide a medium so other sellers could sell their books through their sites. This way, they won't need any space for their house cause they sell other's product.
Meanwhile, barnes and nobles is a book retailer, which means they produce and put their own books to the stores.</span>
