1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
docker41 [41]
4 years ago
6

Leather and beef are jointly produced such that an increase in the production of one results in an equal increase in the product

ion of the other. An increase in the demand for leather will most likely cause_______
Business
1 answer:
eduard4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

An increase in the demand for leather will most likely cause an increase in the demand for beef in the short run.

Explanation:

We can establish from the question that the two products are jointly produced. The two products are simply - Leather and Beef.

There's thus a direct relationship between the production of one and the other. That is, an increase in the production of leather causes an equal increase in the production of beef.

Having considered that, it is important to underscore the general human behaviors to issues on Demand. A rational individual will buy more of a product if the price is low. The more the demand, the more the increase in production.

For leather and beef, there is a critical factor that necessitate there joint production. This is that the byproducts from the production of one, say, Beef, will form an input in the production of the other. This relationship further lends credence to our foregoing assertion that the both products share direct relationship. Using the byproducts obtained from the production of one as an input will not increase the economies of scale of the other, it'll lead to an equal increase in the production levels.

Thus, an increase in the demand for leather signals an increase in the production of leather. Hence, with increase in production of leather, there's an equal increase in the production of beef with direct consequence on product demand, while taking advantage of the economies of scale derived from, and the competitive pricing.

You might be interested in
Is it ethical for u.s. regulations to put u.s. companies at an apparent disadvantage to their foreign competitors? explain why o
Varvara68 [4.7K]
Universal ethic can be define as actions that are taken out of duty and obligation to a purely moral ideal rather than based on the needs of the situation, since the universal principles are seen to apply to everyone, everywhere, all the time. Based on the universal ethic, we feel that it is ethical forU.S. regulation to put U.S. companies at an apparent disadvantage to their foreign competitors because in a competitive market, all the companies have to face to a fair competition. U.S. regulation should not hide the disadvantages of its own nation company and try to protect their interest.In contrast, U.S. regulation should disclose all the disadvantages to every stakeholder especially investors because with the transparency of a company’s financial statement, the investor just can make a right decision whether to invest in that company. To solve the ethical dilemma, trust <span>versus loyalty element should be consider. Instead of continue protecting U.S. companies, U.S.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Removal for cause is a device used to prevent a prospective juror who is biased from serving on a case. true or false
olasank [31]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

A Juror is a member of a jury in a court of law. It is expected that a Juror carries out his  / her duty with a maximum objectivity without being partial or bias. For this reason , a set of criteria are used to screen potential Jurors during selection and if any is sound unqualified , such will be prevented from being part of a Jury.

The two methods of screening are peremptory where the attorney removes a Juror without giving any reason and the removal for cause where the potential Juror is removed because it is perceived that he will be impartial in the course of duty.

5 0
4 years ago
Terry is calculating the present value of a bonus he will receive next year. The process he is using is called:
MArishka [77]

The process used by Terry is known as Discounting.

<h3><u>What is Discounting?</u></h3>
  • A value obtained in the future is converted to an equivalent value received right away through the process of discounting.
  • Discounting takes into account the relative value of a dollar received now against one received in 50 years, for instance.
  • By converting future dollars into current dollars, the discounting process allows for the conversion of units of value over a range of time periods.
  • Decision-makers utilize discounting to fully comprehend the costs and benefits of policies that have long-term effects.

Discounting is a method for calculating the gap between current and future values.

Know more about Discounting with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14954197

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
Jim manages a small factory that produces circuit boards. Jim operates from the belief that a good product creates demand. He fo
marta [7]

Option C

production orientation has Jim adopted

<u>Explanation:</u>

Production orientation accompanies the hypothesis that any goods of great quality can be willingly traded. Production Orientation is the common passageway of any firm that is essentially concerned with production manners. A production-oriented enterprise is largely concerned and converged on producing or assembling as multiple units as viable.

The unique destination is to create supreme quantity, such a firm strives to maximize its profitability by utilizing administrations of range. This procedure is sufficient simply where the potential of the goods in the store is notable or the company engages in an extremely huge increase in businesses. This kind of business thinks that if they can execute the most suitable 'mousetrap,' their clients will befall to them.

3 0
3 years ago
Creating an endowment Personal Finance Problem On completion of her introductory finance​ course, Marla Lee was so pleased with
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

Course cost netxt year: 919.8

Perpetuity fund  at 6% return: 24,205.27

Perpetuity funds at 8% return: 15,858.63

Explanation:

1 student 300

3 student 900

it grows at 2.2% per year

the return on the fund will be of 6%

The cost of the couse for next year will be:

900 x (1+2.2%) = 900 x 1.022 = 919.8

The perpetuity will be calculate as follow:

\frac{cost}{return-growth} = Perpetuity

\frac{919.8}{0.06-0.022} = Perpetuity

Perpetuity fund: 24205.26316

Ifthe return is for 8% per year:

\frac{919.8}{0.08-0.022} = Perpetuity

Perpetuity funds: 15858.62069

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Falcon Co. produces a single product. Its normal selling price is $29 per unit. The variable costs are $15 per unit. Fixed costs
    5·1 answer
  • On February 15, 2011, Spring Hope Corporation repurchases 1,200 shares of its outstanding common stock for $7 per share. On Marc
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be considered the highest risk portfolio
    15·2 answers
  • If $2,000,000 of 10% bonds are issued at 97, the amount of cash received from the sale is
    7·1 answer
  • State 2 secondary market research Ford mothers could use
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Supplies on hand are valued at $1,760.
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPP
    12·1 answer
  • In what year did starbucks serve its first caffè latte?
    15·1 answer
  • QUESTION 7 of 20: Money market refers to:
    13·1 answer
  • To ensure the completeness of a business message, a writer should.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!