Answer:
Take a look at the 'proof' below
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph of the function g(x) is similar to that of the function f(t). The local minimum, local maximum, absolute minimum, maximum etc... of 'x' is always the closest x-intercept of the graph of f(t).
Let's check if this statement is right. The two local minimum(s) of the function f(t) occurs at x = 2, and x = 6. The two local maximum(s) occur at 1/4 and 4. As you can see the maximum / minimum of the function g(x) is always an x-intercept, x = 3, x = 7.
For part (b) the absolute maximum value of the function f(t), is 8. The closest x-intercept is 9, which is our solution.
(x,y)
sub those for x and y and see if you get a true statement
(2,-8)
6(2)+-8=-4
12-8=-4
4=-4
fasle
(2,8)
6(2)+8=4
12+8=4
20=4
false
(1,2)
6(1)+2=4
4+2=4
6=4
false
(1,-10)
6(1)+-10=4
6-10=-4
-4=-4
true
ANSWER IS D
Answer:$75.04
Step-by-step explanation:
last year price=$67
12% of 67
12/100 x 67
(12 x 67) ➗ 100
804 ➗ 100=8.04
Since it has risen by 12%
There new price is 67+8.04=75.04
How to solve:
( x , y )
Plug the values in to the equation and solve
-3x+5y=2x+3y
(2,4) plugged in would be
-3(2)+5(4)=2(2)+3(4)
All you have to do is solve this and if the two sides are not equal(like 4=20), then it is not a solution. Just plug in (3,3) next.
Hope this helped!!!
Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
