How many players have 3,000 hits and 500 home runs.

What social, economic, and material gains did African Americans make after the civil rights era? Why did some black Americans do

konstantin123 [22]

After the Civil Rights Era, many black people were able to thrive and make significant social, economic and material gains. Many African-Americans moved to cities in order to find better work opportunities. Others decided to pursue higher education, as institutions were more accepting of their enrolment. Many African-Americans joined the middle class and were able to buy houses in desirable areas.

There are many reasons why gains were not the same across the board. While many African-Americans took advantage of these opportunities, others were stuck in a cycle of poverty and oppression that originated during slavery. Others lived in communities where these opportunities were not available, or faced high levels of discrimination and racism.

The black community, as many other communities, has a class stratification. This means that many within the community belong to high classes, many others are middle class, and many are from the lower classes, regardless of the fact that they share the same skin colour. Because of this, sometimes tensions can arise within the community. Many people from the lower classes might resent higher ones, while people from the higher classes can sometimes fail to see the constraints that the lower classes have.

7 0

3 years ago

WAY 1. What level of government (local, state, or national) would best suits each category?

Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

For Way 1: What level of government (local, state, or national[*]) would best suits each category?

Immigration: National.
Education: State.
Environment: State.
Water Rights: Local/State.
Homeland Security: National
Unemployment: State.
Transportation Infrastructure: State/National.

For Way 2: How does each level of govt. affect each policy category? This way may help you organize your thoughts more.

Most of the issues should be handled by the state. Things like immigration and homeland security should be managed by the Federal Government because they effect the nation as a whole; while water rights should be managed either by the local municipal government or by the state. Things like transportation infrastructure should be maintained by the state, as you do pay taxes to the state government to maintain them. However, interstates are federal roads and should be maintained by either the state they lie in or federal government.

Explanation:

Immigration is a national issue. Immigrants can go wherever in the country they want, and that is why the Federal Government should handle this.

For me, education policies should be left to the states to decide. The Federal Government could set guidelines down as to what needs to be required generally, but otherwise, let that be an issue the states handle.

When it comes to environment, not everyone agrees how to handle this topic. I think it should be up to the states to decide how they are going to handle this issue. It would allow states like Washington and California that are supposedly "sticking up for the environment" to band together without Federal interference and it would allow states like Texas and Idaho to be free to do their own thing without Federal interference. The Federal Government should only step in there are building cities being built on toxic waste dumps, should there be any toxic waste dumps.

On the topic of water rights, I do not know what you mean. Everyone has the right to clean water. And keeping that water clean and accessible should be handled by the local government. The state should step in if the local government isn't keeping the water clean and accessible.

Homeland security is a national issue that effects the nation as a whole and should be handled by the Federal Government.

Unemployment is a national issue, but I think the states should handle it. Every state (and city for that matter) can set its own minimum wage and local policies that can help businesses decide if they want to hire more or less people. For example, if the local or state government sets the minimum wage to $20/hour but the business isn't making enough money to pay all of its employees (say it has 20 employees), it will either lay off/fire a number of those employees and avoid hiring more to allow it to pay the minimum wage, cut the time employees are working so they work less time and require less pay, or raise its prices. Of course, a small business likely wouldn't be able to raise its prices and probably can't afford to cut the time its employees are on staff. This means more people will be out of work, and prices will also be higher to pay for the wages for those still in the workforce. Like the environment, people differ on this topic and I think its best to keep the federal government out of this issue to ensure it gets handled the way the locals want it to.

Highways like US. Route 101 should be managed by the state, since they aren't as important to inter-state travel as the auspiciously named interstate system. However, interstates should be maintained by both/either the state or the Federal governments.

I take it the question is from a test, so I would guess you should also consult what the lessons or textbooks say about the topic. The question is worded in such a way that it is asking for your opinion, but I would suggest sticking as close to the course as possible for the sake of not getting a bad grade (or worse grade if you already have a bad grade).

7 0

3 years ago

Which developmental approach argues that different environmental pressures in primeval times forced the separation of gender rol

Andrej [43]

Evolutionary developmental approach argues that different environmental pressures in primeval times forced the separation of gender roles.

The environment can be defined as the totality of all biotic and abiotic factors and their influences that affect human life. All living or biotic elements are animals, plants, forests, fisheries and birds, while abiotic or abiotic elements include water, land, sunlight, rocks and air.

"environment" in its true sense simply means "environment" (environment). A person, object, element, or system's environment therefore includes all other entities that surround it.

The environment consists primarily of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere. However, it can be roughly divided into two types: (a) microenvironment and (b) macroenvironment.

Learn more about environment here:brainly.com/question/17413226

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

A medicine man was called a sachem. a. True b. False

alexandr1967 [171]

False. A sachem is somewhat like a leader/head of a group while a medicine man is called a doctor.

8 0

3 years ago

What is meant by functionalism?Explain with example.

andrey2020 [161]

Functionalism:

This is one of the important sociological perspective and is also known as consensus theory.

Explanation:

Functionalist perspective postulates that every aspect of society is responsible for its stability and proper functioning as each aspect or part of it is interdependent on other. Some of the sociologists who propagated this perspective were Emile Durkheim, Robert Merton and Talcott Parsons.

One example of functionalism is that government offers education to children of the country so that tomorrow that can support their near and dear ones and the funds which are used by government for providing education is the money of citizens only collected through taxes. So, here citizens and government are interdependent on each other.

8 0

3 years ago