1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
2 years ago
8

Solve the equastion for x + 2 1/2 =10

Mathematics
1 answer:
Virty [35]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

x= 7 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract the 1/2 to get it out of the way (whatever you do on one side of the = sign you have to do to the other)

So 10- 1/2= 9 1/2

Subtract the 2 to get it out of the way

9 1/2-2=

7 1/2

Hope it helped :)

You might be interested in
What is .466666 as a fraction?
katovenus [111]
As a fraction it is 466666/1000000
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help ASAP
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

the top left one

Step-by-step explanation:

because the numbers are the same witch means it matches toe rate

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please tell fast plzzzzzz​
laiz [17]

Answer:

x=90-44=46is your answer

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1800 yards per hour is the same rate as which of the following?
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

a............ you are welcome

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"assume that s is a non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded above and lambda is the least upper bound. Prove that for all
s2008m [1.1K]

By definition, if \lambda is the least upper bound of the set S, it means two thing:

  • \forall x \in S,\ x \leq \lambda
  • \forall \varepsilon>0,\ \exists x \in S:\ x>\lambda-\varepsilon

In other words, the least upper bound of a set is greater than or equal to every single element of the set, but it is "close enough" to the elements of the set, because you guaranteed to find elements in the set between \lambda-\varepsilon and \lambda

For example, pick S = [1,10). Obvisouly, the least upper bound is \lambda = 10. In fact, every number in [1,10) is smaller than 10, but as soon as you take away something from 10, say 0.01, you get 9.99, and there are elements in S greater than 9.99, say 9.9999.

So, the claim is basically proven by definition: if \beta < \lambda, let 0 < \delta = \lambda - \beta. By definition, there exists \alpha \in S:\ \alpha > \lambda - \delta.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How to find y in the equation y+2x=3 then graph the answer
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone help me simplify (2n + 2) + (8 + 8)
    15·1 answer
  • I’m still waiting for some one to help me :(
    8·1 answer
  • Simplify using the distributive property
    5·1 answer
  • dylan started working on homework at 5:45 p.m. it took him 1 hour and 57 minutes to complete it what time did
    13·1 answer
  • A line passes through the point (–1,–2) and is perpendicular to the line with the equation y = –x – 1. What's the equation of th
    14·1 answer
  • Write and solve a proportion to answer the question.<br><br> 34 is 60% of what number?
    9·1 answer
  • 5(4+3√24-5(8+9÷3)³<br>ayuds​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the equation of a line that is perpendicular to the line y = -3x + 2 and passes through the point (6,8)?
    8·1 answer
  • Please look at picture and help
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!