Answer: The Party Platform or Manifesto
Explanation:
The Party platform or manifesto is a collection of a party's or individual policy goals which is usually presented in an attractive way to gathered the backing and votes of the general public. It could also be referred as a collection of aims, goals and objectives, a political party and its candidate seeks to achieve while in office.
The word Party platform is a combination of the two word party and platform. Hence, it derive its politically meaning from the idea that a particular candidate could leverage on a platform to gather public support towards he/she political goals and ambitions.
Aside selection of party nominees for various government positions, the approval and enactment of the party platform is one of the major reasons national party convention hold at specific period depending on the party involved.
An example of a Party Platform is the famous The Ninety-Five Theses of Martin Luther in 1517.
Answer:
d) continues throughout life.
Explanation:
Political socialization occurs all life long as a process when people acquire ideas and values. This initially happens in the family, then educational endeavours could be later, but also social groups have influence. Together with mass media pressing on, and other forms of propaganda then political socialization is increased.
There are other reasons why it continues lifelong, the laws, religion, sex and gender form or are embraced in political ideals.
The geography, race are also often factors that will affect the process.
The change in values is more often than tought if we consider how non static some variables are.
Answer:
They wanted to take back control of the state government from the ... Bourbon is the name of a line of French Kings ruling for over 200 years, and it is also the name of a ... The idea that the South should become industrialized like the North.
Explanation:
Answer: D
Explanation:
The middle colonies are KNOWN for being diverse.
Relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians have been shaped not only by the theologies and beliefs of the three religions, but also, and often more strongly, by the historical circumstances in which they are found. As a result, history has become a foundation for religious understanding. In each historical phase, the definition of who was regarded as Muslim, Jewish, or Christian shifted, sometimes indicating only a religious identification, but more often indicating a particular social, economic, or political group.
While the tendency to place linguistic behaviour, religious identity, and cultural heritage under one, pure definition has existed for a very long time, our modern age with its ideology of nationalism is particularly prone to such a conflation. Ethnic identities have sometimes been conflated with religious identities by both outsiders and insiders, complicating the task of analyzing intergroup and intercommunal relations. For example, Muslims have often been equated with Arabs, effacing the existence of Christian and Jewish Arabs (i.e., members of those religions whose language is Arabic and who participate primarily in Arab culture), ignoring non-Arab Muslims who constitute the majority of Muslims in the world. In some instances, relations between Arabs and Israelis have been understood as Muslim-Jewish relations, ascribing aspects of Arab culture to the religion of Islam and Israeli culture to Judaism. This is similar to what happened during the Crusades, during which Christian Arabs were often charged with being identical to Muslims by the invading Europeans. While the cultures in which Islam predominates do not necessarily make sharp distinctions between the religious and secular aspects of the culture, such distinctions make the task of understanding the nature of relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians easier, and therefore will be used as an analytic tool in this chapter.
