Step-by-step explanation: First you convert the equation into standard form, which is y=mx+b . Then graph it. When it is in the form y=mx+b it is easier to graph. Then you can see the intercepts on the graph and come up with your answer.
Hope this helps!
We have :
s - 39⁰+ s - 9⁰ = s + 29⁰
s + s - s = 29⁰ + 9⁰ + 39⁰
s = 77⁰
Answer: 77⁰
Ok done. Thank to me :>
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
2+2=2 and then 1 come now you have 1 2 and 1 1
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
