Answer:
(B) True.
Explanation:
For sociologists, there are dominant norms that regulate society's well being and any behavior contrary to these will mean a person is perfoming deviant behavior.
Often psychologists will research on genetic causes, and of course other inner motivations. While in contrast sociologists will explain deviance focusing on how social boundaries, forces, and structures pose conditions where deviances takes place.
Thus psychological explanations take a different focus, they see individuals as unique and primary unit of analysis. They believe human beings are ultimately reponsible in cases of crimes or other acts that are deviant.
The personality of an individual creates conditions for causing this deviances. Of course in some cases mental health issuses or non mental health concerns will link.
Answer:
yes his consumption could change
Explanation:
His consumption of pizza could change since he might need to consume less pizza to afford more tacos. We could use the marginal rate of substitution to explain this where we describe how much goods one is willing to give up for the other while retaining maximum utility/satisfaction. So Jonny may be asked here what combination of tacos and pizza would give him same satisfaction while keeping good budget and retaining satisfaction.
Answer:
Reducing trade barriers
Explanation:
<u>If governments choose protectionism, they harm citizens who could benefit from the products, services or jobs offered by foreign companies.</u>
If, for example, the “A” government sets <em>tariffs to protect the domestic market</em>, the “B” government <em>could respond with tariffs in retaliation</em>, which would result in both countries being harmed. So, the problem of trade warfare is still represented by a “Prisoner's Dilemma” game because it says that two people, in this case, two governments, can decide not to cooperate even if it goes against the interest of both.
On the other hand, <em>unrestricted free trade could go against governments that develop trade policies based on national economic well-being.</em>
The game's equilibrium solution would be for both countries to opt to reduce their trade barriers through negotiations.
