1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mumz [18]
2 years ago
13

Find the 66th term of the arithmetic sequence 3, 13, 23, ...

Mathematics
1 answer:
den301095 [7]2 years ago
7 0
I believe the 66th term will be 653
You might be interested in
A 47 inch piece of steel is cut into three pieces so that the second piece is twiceAs long as the first piece and the third piec
Neko [114]
Confused be more detailed ;)
Please not trying to be rid
5 0
3 years ago
In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o
melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

C. z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558  

D. z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96  z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912 estimated proportion of orders not accurate

p_o=0.10 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558  

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96  z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z  

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.  

6 0
3 years ago
Put these in order, using brackets and set notation.<br> 3/5, 3/2, 3/7, 3/10, 1/3
jenyasd209 [6]
[3/2][1/3][3/5][3/7][3/10]
4 0
3 years ago
Please help and show work!!
Paladinen [302]

B. Because 20 is greter than 18.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Kristen had dinner and her meat cost was $18.25. she plans to leave a 20% tip. what is the amount of tip that he will pay? ​
klasskru [66]
$3.65 is the tip he will pay
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Three more than the product of five and a number
    6·2 answers
  • Suppose you have only hundreds, tens, and ones blocks. What are two different ways you could make the number 1,718
    11·1 answer
  • If you have 100 dollars and you have to buy 100 animals using all the money how many of each animal would you buy...............
    14·1 answer
  • a total of $30 was placed in for envelopes a different amount in each one money from the largest share was taken up to double ea
    15·1 answer
  • The table shows the results of an experiment in which subjects taking either a drug or a placebo either reported fatigue or did
    7·2 answers
  • Can yall help wit the numbers and the questions
    6·2 answers
  • Plz help me out, this is from a study guide for my test today! thank you!
    8·1 answer
  • Solve the equation -x^2+5x+9=0
    14·1 answer
  • 5380 in scientific notation
    12·1 answer
  • What is the value of x for 10x+1=3(4x+2)-3? ​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!