The given statement is False.
People who keep domestic animals are strictly liable for any harm inflicted by the animals.
Explanation:
People keep many type of animals as pets in their homes. Some of the common animals which are being kept as pets are:
So if animals kept by people in their homes harm someone, or something, then the owner of the animal is not liable for it. This is because the animal's behavior is not is control of the people. People can only train them, but to always obey the owner is not in the hands of the owner. The nature of animals may not always remain the same, they can cause harm to things or people, but because they are animals, so the owner is not liable.
For example, a man has a dog as pet and his dog went in the neighbor's garden and dig the soil. In this case the owner is not liable for the damage the dog caused. No doubt the owner could help the neighbor in settling the things together but he is not liable for the damage,
Learn more about animals at:
brainly.com/question/11013494
#LearnWithBrainly
The ant is 0.125 inches long. (1/8= 0.125)
The ant is 0.3175 centimeters long (there are 2.54 centimeters in an inch so 2.54x0.125= 0.3175)
The ant is 0.003175 meters. (move the decimal)
The ant is 3.175 millimeters. (move the decimal)
Hope this helps!
Answer: The technique that is used to sell to customers and persuade customers is called low ball
When marketing your product psychological tactics can be used to persuade customers through understanding their behaviour.
There are so many ways to psychological convince your customers to buy your products for example when you are selling health food there are ways that you can manipulate people's mind for example showing them pictures of how unhealthy eating affect the person's body; by seeing those pictures a mind will tell the person to change their behaviour so that they will not look that way.
Knowing how the person brain works in making a decision to buy can help a business owner make the right decisions to persuade their customers appropriately.
Answer:
(b) no, because the promise was illusory
Explanation:
