Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Material Cost per unit = Total Material Cost ÷ Equivalent units of production
= $35,500 ÷ 10,000 units
= $3.55
Conversion Cost per unit = Total conversion cost ÷ Equivalent units of production
= $54,000 ÷ 12,000 units
= $4.5
Total Manufacturing cost per unit = Material cost per unit + conversion cost per unit
= 3.55 + 4.5
= $8.05
Answer:
Most auctions are without reserve and therefore the auctioneer cannot withdraw the lamp.
Explanation:
Every auction seems to be either "of-reserve" versus "without-reserve." So the reaction to whether an auction house manages higher bids depends on that form of bidding being carried out. In an offering with reserves, the auction house may reject a higher offer (retain the privilege to reject ...) in which any better bid should be approved in an offering without deposit.
Put differently, the auction house is not obliged to deliver to the top purchaser in a with reserved sale. Essentially, the next bigger raise reflects the minimum price.
Answer:
Option (E) is correct.
Explanation:
Under the perfectly competitive market conditions, there are large number of buyers and sellers and there is no restrictions on the entry and exit of the firms. Prices of the goods are determined by the market forces and the demand curve for a firm in a perfectly competitive environment varies significantly from the market demand curve. The demand curve is horizontal because all the goods in a perfectly competitive market are considered as perfect substitutes.
Answer: Social comparison
Explanation:
The social comparison is one of the important theory in the society which state that the individual person can determine their own personal and the social importance by comparing their own qualities with the other people. The coal comparison is mainly proposed by the Leon festinger in the year 1954.
According to the given scenario, the self evaluation is basically conducted by the Lori is best illustrate example of the social comparison as people generally compared themselves with the other people for the purpose of self motivation and improvement.
Therefore, Social comparison is the correct answer.
Answer:
less than the social cost of producing it
Explanation:
A negative externality is a cost that is suffered by a third party as a result of an economic transaction. In a transaction, the producer and consumer are the first and second parties, and third parties include any individual, organisation, property owner, or resource that is indirectly affected. Externalities are also referred to as spill over effects, and a negative externality is also referred to as an external cost. Some externalities, like waste, arise from consumption while other externalities, like carbon emissions from factories, arise from production. For example, If we consider a manufacturer of computers which emits pollutants into the atmosphere, the free market equilibrium will occur when marginal private benefit = marginal private costs, at output Q and price P. The market equilibrium is at point A. However, if we add external costs, the socially efficient output is Q1, at point B. At Q marginal social costs (at C) are greater than marginal social benefits (at A) so there is a net loss. For example, if the marginal social benefit at A is £5m, and the marginal social cost at C is £10m, then the net welfare loss of this output is £10m - £5m = £5m. In fact, any output between Q1 and Q creates a net welfare loss, and the area for all the welfare loss is the area ABC. Therefore, in terms of welfare, markets over-produce goods that generate external costs. In the market equilibrium, the marginal consumer values the good less than the social cost of producing it.
