He can increase the thickness of the paint on the apples.
Or he can use glossier finish on the apples to make them stand out...
Answer:
"
CRL (certificate revocation list)" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
- A collection of such subscriber bases containing accreditation or certification status combined with the validation, revocation, or outdated certification within each final customer is known as CRL.
- Only certain subscribing workstations with a certain underlying cause authentication system should have been duplicated.
The correct answer is geo fencing.
<h3>
what is geo fencing?</h3>
A geofence is a fictitious geographic boundary that can be entered or exited by a mobile device or RFID tag. Geofencing is a location-based service in which an app or other software programme uses radio frequency identification (RFID), Wi-Fi, GPS, or cellular data to trigger a targeted marketing action (such as a text, email, social media advertisement, or app notification).
There are three ways to use this technology to target customers: geotargeting, geofencing, and beaconing. You can track a consumer's location using GPS, Bluetooth, and beacons.
learn more about geo fencing refer:
brainly.com/question/20317002
#SPJ4
Answer:
functional
Explanation:
Suppose you are pivoting to a certain new company, and you find that your experience is not suited. You are certainly going to highlight your skills that are required for the job. And suppose you are lacking work experience, concerning the position you are opting for. Also, you have many gaps in employment. Then the best format suited to you is functional format.
Was this in reference to literal audio archives? If so, I don't see any cons beside possible copyright infringement.
If you're talking about the codecs themselves, then I can do that.
<span>Pros:
</span>- Widespread acceptance. Supported in nearly all hardware devices, and continually adopted by newer ones.
- Faster decoding. Much more so than FLAC, Vorbis, etc.
- Relaxed licensing schedule.
<span>Cons:
</span><span>
</span>- Lower quality and efficiency than most modern codecs. (To be fair, never really noticed this one).
- Sometimes the maximum bitrate isn't enough.
- Pretty much void/unusable for high definition audio (higher than <span>48kHz).</span>
