<em>Poverty, parent neglect, low self-esteem, alcohol and drug abuse can be connected to why people break law.</em>
<em></em>
With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
Answer:
The higher the price, the larger the quantity produced.
Explanation:
The Principle of the Law of Supply has nothing to do with Law. It relates to economics.
A good case to illustrate the Law of Supply would be Apple iPhones. Prices remained very high therefore, the quantity was LARGE.
Conversely, during the pandemic people were not spending and out of jobs. Apple responded with a much affordable iPhone. *Everything is driven by market forces.
Answer:
Apply the brakes as hard as you can without locking them. ...
If the brakes lock-up, you will feel the vehicle start to skid. ...
As soon as the vehicle stops skidding, push down on the brake pedal again. ...
In case of brake failure, pump the brake pedal quickly.
