Answer:
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.
Explanation:
Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.
And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.
Answer:
Ben was going too fast when he hit a slick spot and lost control of the car.
Explanation:
The Cubs were leading 3-0 over the Florida Marlins.
Answer:
The question is incomplete. These are the claims of the Classical Theory of Criminology;
- The first basic claim made by the classical theory of crime causation is that human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will and rational choice.
- The classical theory believes that crime is a result of pain and pleasure which are the two central determinants of human behavior.
- The classical theory of crime causation is that to deter law violators punishment must be meted accordingly to serve as an example to others who would also violate this law.
- The classical theory of crime causation also believes that it cannot be denied that the root principles of right and wrong are in the nature of things.
- Also according to the classical theory, crime is an immoral behavior degrades the relationship quality that exists between individuals and society.
Explanation:
The classical theory is a school of thought popular in 18th century Europe. It believes that criminals were rational and that the severity of legal punishment should be restricted to the degree necessary for deterrence.
There are five key principles to understanding the classical school of thought. They are; Rationality, Hedonism, punishment and human rights
Answer:
Judging by the question itself, I'm going to hazard a guess and say that the answer is b.
Explanation:
No but seriously, this helped me out so much.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
they wont reach the federal courts
