That will depend on the coefficient of friction between the sliding surfaces, and also on Zak's weight. We don't have any of that information.
Is 7.35 because you subtic them and you're get the answer
Given what we know, we can confirm that doubling the distance between you and a source of radiation decreases your exposure by 75%.
<h3>How is distance related to radiation exposure?</h3>
- As expected, increasing the distance from the source of the radiation will reduce its negative effects.
- Counter-intuitively however, doubling the distance does not reduce by half, but rather reduces its effects by 3/4th.
- This is due to the fact that the radiation effects from the source are inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
- This causes the changes to be far greater than expected.
Therefore, given that the radiation is proportional to the square of the distance, instead of being of a more direct relation, we can confirm that when doubling the distance between yourself and the source of the radiation, you can reduce its effects by 3/4 or 75%.
To learn more about radiation visit:
brainly.com/question/9815840?referrer=searchResults
<span>Kinesics
is the study of the interpretation body motion communication such as facial
expressions and gestures. It does not include the verbal communication
because you can communicate through words. Kinesics is a nonverbal
communication that does not involve words. Example of this is when you are in a
different country in which you do not know how to speak their native language. To
understand their feelings, you don’t listen to their words but you observe
their actions and facial structure when communicating. So the answer is letter
A.</span>
V1 = 0.60 m3, P1 = 5.00atm, T1=400K
V2 = ??m3, P2 = 4.00atm, T2=200K
P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2
V2 = T2P1V1/T1P2 = 200×5×0.60/400×4.00 = 600/1600
V2 = 0.38 m3
