1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Free_Kalibri [48]
3 years ago
11

Which part of a supreme court decision presents the argument

Law
2 answers:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
6 0

Dissenting view refers to the judges' disagreement with public opinion. They also call it the report of a minority. There are different kinds of Dissenting opinions.

<h3>What do you mean by dissenting opinion?</h3>

Dissenting opinions often occur when there is a consensus of part of the case.

A dissenting  (or opposing) opinion is a legal opinion in certain legal cases written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the public opinion of the court that results in its decision.

Thus, Dissenting view part of a supreme court decision presents the argument.

To learn more about dissenting opinion:

brainly.com/question/11651416

#SPJ4

Leona [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The part that presents the argument in opposition to the courts ruling is dissent.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What article pertains to the Executive Branch? ___________________________
choli [55]

Answer:

Article II: The Executive Branch. Article II of the Constitution establishes the Executive branch of the federal government. It defines the office of President and Vice President, and an Electoral College to elect them

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
To which of the following would Kant and Nozick agree?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.

Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.

8 0
3 years ago
When your driver license is _____, you are no longer licensed to drive.
cupoosta [38]

Answer:

Suspended

Explanation:

You are never allowed to drive if your driver license is suspended or you never took the driver test.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Some minority DULL shareholders objected strongly against a merging of the DULL and Exciting corporations, as they had been conv
galben [10]

Answer:

Shareholders will have rights according to the  shareholder agreement that they would have entered into, merger terms between the companies and applicable government laws and rules.

Explanation:

However it has to be ensured that the majority shareholder even after merger will have the fiduciary duty towards the minority shareholder and that they shall ensure that all benefits and rights are being given to the minority shareholder and all acts of the majority shareholder are in good faith.

6 0
3 years ago
In the U.S.,The South Carolina state constitution is the supreme law of the land?
Artemon [7]
I’m pretty sure it’s false but not 100% sure
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which form of government can make the fastest desisions
    11·1 answer
  • Intellectual property can be protected by
    6·1 answer
  • What is the correct order of steps in the naturalization process?
    12·2 answers
  • Why does the probation officer consider the time between the charge and the individual appearing before the judge to be the most
    5·2 answers
  • Importance of ubuntu in our democratic society​
    9·1 answer
  • Choose at least 1 peer-reviewed article and at least 1 other scholarly source that relates to your passion in criminal justice (
    13·1 answer
  • Which primary areas did President Johnson's Great Society seek to address?
    12·2 answers
  • Sawarasenai kimi wa shojo nano??
    14·2 answers
  • ***50 Points*** ONE QUESTION
    5·1 answer
  • Match the career options with their associated responsibilities.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!