1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natka813 [3]
3 years ago
11

A police officer stopped a driver who had run a red light. Upon approaching the car, the officer noticed a strong odor of alcoho

l and immediately asked whether the driver had been drinking. The driver admitted having had several alcoholic drinks that evening. The driver, charged with driving while intoxicated, moved to suppress the officer's testimony regarding the driver's statement about his drinking. The driver argued that the officer had elicited the statement without providing the requisite Miranda warnings. The prosecutor has responded that the statement should be allowed in the prosecution's case-in-chief or, at a minimum, should be allowed as impeachment in the event the driver testifies and denies drinking. How should the court rule regarding the driver's statement admitting his drinking
Law
1 answer:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Police Officer Stopping a Driver Who Had Run a Red Light

The driver's statement should be allowed, as pleaded by the prosecution, because  the driver was not in custody for Miranda  purposes when the free admission of drinking alcohol was made.

Explanation:

The driver freely disclosed his statement about having several alcoholic drinks that evening.  At the time he made the statement, the driver was not under custody, he was not under arrest, and he was not suspected of driving under intoxication.  The officer stopped him because he had run a red light (another traffic offense) and only noticed the strong odor of alcohol after the traffic offense was committed.  Possibly, the alcohol odor could have emanated from another source altogether.

You might be interested in
I have an essay due tomorrow could anyone help me do the following: Write a paragraph on
mafiozo [28]
You could start by saying “ You would want a job in the field of government because..” and then search up good reasons why you would. give job examples and why someone would chose that
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. What is the importance of aligning security policies, controls and procedures with regulations?
olga55 [171]

Answer:

TO ENSURE THAT ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS OPERATE WITHIN THE LAW.

TO GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS.

TO PROMOTE UNITY IN EXECUTION OF WORK.

Explanation: laws are meant to be obeyed and enforced, organizations and individuals operating in a given Country, State or County are expected to work within the ambit of the law. When the security policies, procedures, controls are aligned with regulations it helps to guarantee easy understanding and facilitates its compliance.

The safety Management program also involves the Law of the land,the alignment of policies, procedures, controls and regulations will help organisations and individuals to work or operate safely by practising the Law. It will help to prevent ACCIDENTS,SECURITY BREACH,and other possibilities which can lead to THEFT,FRAUD,LOSS OF LIFE etc.

Aligning policies, procedures, controls and regulations will ensure that every organization and individuals execute their jobs following the same set standards according to the laws guiding it, through this systems can be predictable and compliance can be achieved easily.

5 0
3 years ago
The supremacy clause plays a key role in disputes among states
Olenka [21]

Answer:

The Supremacy Clause is located in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States. The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution, any and all treaties made under the powers of the Constitution and/or federal laws, and all laws made by the federal government under the authority of the Constitution are the Supreme Law of the Land. This means that are federal laws as described above are given higher authority and power over any conflicting state law. Any state law that conflicts with federal law will be stuck down as unconstitutional.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
This ones really confusing me whos more suspicions Steve or Alex from mine and craft
Fantom [35]
Steve ong no cap no kizzie
6 0
3 years ago
What is normativity of law
dsp73

Answer:

Explanation:

When we say a law is normative, we mean two things. On the one hand, it means the particular law was made according to the procedure laid down for its making. This is technical validity or normativity of the law, falling within the pure theory of law by Hans Kelsen. On the other hand, a law is normative if it has some moral content in it.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Whichofthefollowingisadiscoverydeviceusedinvirtuallyeverymedicalmalpracticecase?*a.Subpoenafordocumentsb.Requestforphysicalormen
    12·2 answers
  • Please help 50 points
    14·2 answers
  • What is one thing that you believe the legal system does well?
    13·1 answer
  • Descripe two ways in which the law protect citizens against xenophobia​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these is the best sign that someone might be dealing with a mental health disorder?
    6·1 answer
  • Who appoints the justices? Who approves the justices? WHY?
    7·1 answer
  • During the 1880s, Cameron was convicted of a felony and given a prison sentence. He observed that the peculiar prison that he wa
    5·1 answer
  • 2. Draw Conclusions What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights?
    11·1 answer
  • Here is the information Jordan has found about several different arson charges.
    6·1 answer
  • Represento es have the responsibility to __
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!