1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natka813 [3]
3 years ago
11

A police officer stopped a driver who had run a red light. Upon approaching the car, the officer noticed a strong odor of alcoho

l and immediately asked whether the driver had been drinking. The driver admitted having had several alcoholic drinks that evening. The driver, charged with driving while intoxicated, moved to suppress the officer's testimony regarding the driver's statement about his drinking. The driver argued that the officer had elicited the statement without providing the requisite Miranda warnings. The prosecutor has responded that the statement should be allowed in the prosecution's case-in-chief or, at a minimum, should be allowed as impeachment in the event the driver testifies and denies drinking. How should the court rule regarding the driver's statement admitting his drinking
Law
1 answer:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Police Officer Stopping a Driver Who Had Run a Red Light

The driver's statement should be allowed, as pleaded by the prosecution, because  the driver was not in custody for Miranda  purposes when the free admission of drinking alcohol was made.

Explanation:

The driver freely disclosed his statement about having several alcoholic drinks that evening.  At the time he made the statement, the driver was not under custody, he was not under arrest, and he was not suspected of driving under intoxication.  The officer stopped him because he had run a red light (another traffic offense) and only noticed the strong odor of alcohol after the traffic offense was committed.  Possibly, the alcohol odor could have emanated from another source altogether.

You might be interested in
All of the following statements are true with regard to qualifying business losses EXCEPT:The loss will reduce any other current
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

This deduction, created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, allows non-corporate taxpayers to deduct up to 20 percent of their QBI, plus 20% of qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership (PTP) income.Jul 16, 2019

Explanation:

or 2018, the threshold amount is $315,000 for a married couple filing a joint return, and $157,500 for all other taxpayers. The SSTB limitations don't apply for taxpayers with taxable income at or below the threshold amount.This new deduction is equal to 20% of a taxpayer's “qualified business income” (QBI). QBI is calculated by netting the total amount of qualified income, gain, deduction and loss from any qualified trade or business. ... Capital gains and losses, certain dividends and interest income are some of the excluded items.Apr 2, 2019Section 199A defines a qualified trade or business by exclusion; every trade or business is a qualified business other than: The trade or business of performing services as an employee, and. A specified service trade or business.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the goal of any traffic stop by law enforcement?
taurus [48]
To ensure that the driver understands that the offense that they have broke, meanwhile the officer is trying to maintain a safe situation.

So keep everyone safe, inform the offender, take action via. Verbal Warning, Written Warning, Ticket, or Arrest.
7 0
3 years ago
1. Which is a lesser crime than murder and is committed recklessly or negligently? (1 point)
worty [1.4K]
Which is a lesser crime than murder and is committed recklessly or negligently? - the answer is arson
4 0
3 years ago
Title 18 includes criminal procedure for
Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

Federal

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
Maslowich
Do US Constitution provides the floor beneath individual rights, well stating constitutions can provide greater but not lesser protection. So I think it’s c but I’m not sure!!
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jerome joined the police force a few months back. His seniors have sent him to investigate his very first crime scene. According
    5·2 answers
  • If a plaintiff brings a civil lawsuit against a defendant for breach of contract or fraud, what burden of proof appliesPreponder
    7·1 answer
  • Wh1th09h.Ch03.05
    7·1 answer
  • The W-2 form is a form that tells you _______.
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER WITH (A P E X) ANSWER
    14·1 answer
  • Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't Sant Claus be the most wanted criminals in the world? He breaks into billions of homes in
    15·2 answers
  • हेर्दैमा सुन्दर एवम् विशाल
    14·1 answer
  • Look at the graphic of the three branches of government. Explain to a sixth grade student what these three branches did for the
    13·1 answer
  • What are some laws that are currently evolving in the united states.
    13·1 answer
  • Kevin is a crime scene investigator who has to work alone looking for evidence in an apartment where a homicide occurred. Which
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!