All categories

2 years ago

Game theory suggests that competing firms in an oligopolistic industry may be

2 answers:

6 0

Game theory suggests that competing firms in an oligopolistic industry may be reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will match price cuts but ignore price increases.

<h3>What is Game theory?</h3>

Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.

Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing. Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.

Here are the options:

. too quick to raise prices because they will fail to anticipate that rivals may gain market shares.

b. reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will match price cuts but ignore price increases

c. reluctant to change prices because they anticipate that rivals will ignore price cuts but match price increases

d. too quick to cut prices because they fail to anticipate that rivals may also cut their prices.

To learn more about game theory, please check: brainly.com/question/25746243

Law Incorporation [45]2 years ago

3 0

Game theory suggests that competing firms in an oligopolistic industry may be reluctant to price changes.

<h3>What do you mean by oligopoly?</h3>

An oligopoly is a form of market that is made up of a few large firms engaging in strategic behavior. An automobile is the best example of an oligopoly market.

A game theory suggests that competing firms in an oligopoly industry may be reluctant in changes the price because they can analyze that rivals can match the price cuts but generally ignore the increase in the prices.

Learn more about oligopoly here:

brainly.com/question/14093864

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Barney, a manager, is very conventional, resistant to change, habitual, and does not accept new ideas very easily.This implies t

inna [77]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Sue, a resident of the state of New York, is visiting her aunt in Iowa. On her way, her car is hit by Jerry, a resident of the s

IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

D) Sue can sue Jerry and bring the case to Iowa federal court as this is a case that involves diversity of citizenship.

Explanation:

Diversity of citizenship means that the parties involved in a lawsuit are citizens of different states (within the US) or are citizens of different countries. If a company is involved in a lawsuit, its citizenship is defined as where the company was incorporated or where does it carry its normal business operations.

In this case since Sue is a citizen of the state of New York and Jerry is a citizen of the state of Iowa (diversity of citizenship applies), Sue can choose to sue Jerry in a federal court since the citizens of two different states are involved.

3 0

3 years ago

Andy deposited $3,000 this morning into an account that pays 5 percent interest, compounded annually. Barb also deposited $3,000

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

Barb will earn interest on interest yes because she don't retire the interest

Explanation:

a. Barb will earn compound interest both will aearn compound interest.

b. Barb will earn more interest the first year than Andy both are compound annualy. The first year both will earn the same amount of interest.

c. Barb will earn interest on interest yes because she don't retire the interest and reinvest it.

Compound interest (or compounding interest) is interest calculated on the initial principal, which also includes all of the accumulated interest of previous periods of a deposit or loan

d. After five years, Andy will have more money in his account than Barb. No because he spend his interest.

e. Andy will earn more interest the first year than Barb both are compound annualy. The first year both will earn the same amount of interest.

3 0

3 years ago

If a borrower's monthly interest payment on an interest-only loan at an annual interest rate of 7.3% is $877, how much was the l

mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

$144,200

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Real property taxes are often assessed on the value of the property at the beginning of the year. when property is sold in the m

sergejj [24]

When property is sold in the middle of year, both the buyer and seller can deduct their pro rated portion of the property tax.

The property taxes are based on the assessed value of the property. So when the property tax is pro rated at the time of the transfer, both the buyer and seller can deduct their pro rated portion of the property tax.

Buyer and seller prorations are often applied during real estate closing transactions to divide the cost of expenses like property taxes. Thus, the buyer gets a deduction for the prorated amount of property tax due after closing, and the seller gets the same deduction for the taxes.

Hence, both the buyer and seller receives the deduction for the real property tax.

To learn more about property tax here:

brainly.com/question/15227817

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago