1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Colt1911 [192]
3 years ago
15

A manager receives a forecast for next year. Demand is projected to be 590 units for the first half of the year and 940 units fo

r the second half. The monthly holding cost is $2 per unit, and it costs an estimated $55 to process an order.
a. Assuming that monthly demand will be level during each of the six-month periods covered by the forecast (e.g., 100 per month for each of the first six months), determine an order size that will minimize the sum of ordering and carrying costs for each of the six-month periods. (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.)
Business
1 answer:
BartSMP [9]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

74 units; 93 units

Explanation:

Given that,

Holding cost, H = $2 per unit

Carrying cost, O = $55

Demand in first half, D1 = 590 units

                                       = 590 ÷ 6

                                       = 98.33 per month

Demand in second half, D2 = 940 units

                                       = 940 ÷ 6

                                       = 156.67 per month

For D1; EOQ:

EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times D\times O}{H} }

EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times 98.33\times 55}{2} }

               = 73.54 or 74 units

For D2; EOQ:

EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times D\times O}{H} }

EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times 156.67\times 55}{2} }

               = 92.82 or 93 units

Hence, the appropriate order size will be 74 units and 93 units.

You might be interested in
Employees of a hotel are short-staffed in the kitchen during a banquet event. The food will not be served on time, therefore thr
marta [7]
All of them could work together by saving time helping each other cooking and serving food
4 0
3 years ago
If publishing at a newspaper company is arranged so that editors, editorial assistants, and reporters coordinate to determine wh
Paha777 [63]

The community arrangement of a newspaper company publication that was organized in a coordinated way by editors, editorial assistants and reporters, this arrangement will align with the ideas brought by Mary Parket Follet.

<h3 /><h3>Mary Parker Follet Theory</h3>

The American author became known as the "Management Prophet" because her theory was based on a broader idea of ​​organizational democracy, going beyond the concepts of economic man, to develop concepts whose focus was human relations.

Therefore, Mary Parker Follet's theory is based on the development of man as a social and cooperative being, which develops from his relationships and behavior patterns, being contrary to Taylorism and based on the appreciation of each individual and integration of work.

Find out more information about Mary Parker Follet here:

brainly.com/question/26312475

4 0
3 years ago
There is no correlation between the industrial revolution and social economic changes.
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The industrial revolution resulted in higher standards of livings, better jobs for the working class, and generally speaking a much more comfortable life for most of society's members.

Manufactured products started to lower their prices since total output increased, and common middle class working people were able to purchase them.

European nations became dominant, especially the United kingdom. For the first time in history, China was not the most powerful nation in the world.

The positive effects of the industrial revolution were felt by the middle class, factory owners, business people (bourgeoisie), landowners and governments.

Of course not everything was good, a lot of negative effects came along with the industrial revolution. When cities started to grow due to migration from the countryside to large cities, slums were created, child labor became common and the differences in educational level increased. Working conditions in the factories were not that good either, with long hours and conditions that would currently be considered inhumane.

4 0
4 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
The system that provides common industry definitions for Canada, Mexico, and the United States, which makes it easier to measure
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

Explanation:

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS): It is a system or standard code been used in classifying business by the type of economic activity. These data been used by government and business of United sates, Mexico and Canada. This system make the measurement of industrial, reseller, and government markets easier. NAICS provides common industry definitions for Canada, Mexico, and the United States, which makes it easier to measure economic activity in the three member countries of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAIC has replaced standard industrial classification (SIC) system, which was in place for 50 years.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A ____ is used for an office or small campus, with segment distances measured in tens of meters. it may have only a few hosts, o
    12·1 answer
  • Inflation is a sustained rise in the general level of prices of goods and services.
    9·2 answers
  • People get too stressed when they try to work fast
    10·2 answers
  • Betty Bronson has just retired after 25 years with the electric company. Her total pension funds have an accumulated value of $3
    10·1 answer
  • Delta Services, Inc., is the major wholesale distributor of software in the state of Florida. Its closest competitor is Efficien
    6·1 answer
  • An economic system:
    11·1 answer
  • FedEx Corp. stock ended the previous year at $113.39 per share. It paid a $0.40 per share dividend last year. It ended last year
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about high-LPC leaders is most likely true?
    12·1 answer
  • Presented below is information for Blossom Company for the month of January 2022. Cost of goods sold $270,000 Rent expense $35,0
    12·1 answer
  • 30 POINTS! My package says Package is "Out for Delivery" since 9AM today but the scheduled delivery date is tomorrow. Usually wh
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!