Dfhtddffgvcdfgggvvcdcvbhhjjjjjjjjrr the Eder
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
The amount of interest expense for an interesting period is calculated by multiplying the carrying value of the bonds at the beginning of the period by the effective interest rate.
Amortization is an accounting approach used to periodically decrease the ebook value of a loan or an intangible asset over a fixed time frame. Concerning a mortgage, amortization focuses on spreading out mortgage bills through the years. When applied to an asset, amortization is similar to depreciation.
Amortized price is an accounting approach in which all economic properties need to be suggested on a stability sheet at their amortized fee that is identical to their acquisition general minus their essential payments and any reductions or charges minus any impairment losses and change variations.
Input the corresponding values in cells B1 thru B3. In cellular B4, input the components "=-PMT(B2/1200, B3*12, B1)" to have Excel routinely calculate the monthly charge. As an example, in case you had a $25,000 mortgage at 6.5 percent annual hobby for 10 years, the month-to-month fee could be $283.87.
Learn more about the method of amortization here brainly.com/question/10561878
#SPJ4
The answer to this question is bonds. Bonds are an
investment type where in investors’ gains a fixed-income over their
investments. Bonds are less risky because the return of investment is in a
fixed rate and this is less vulnerable to price swings in the stock market.
