During the medieval era, knights were some of the most respected people because they were the lords of the battlefield and the protectors of the land. So if you were a knight, then you were definitely a big shot. Now boys had to leave home to be trained as a knight because he had to study under a local lord and assist the local lord as a page. He had to dedicate all his time to study the basic skills that he would need in order for him to become a knight. This included combat, hunting, history, and many other things too.
There is a possibility that trump will win the 2016 election and then he will become the 45th presid
Answer:sibling rivalry
Explanation:
What is sibling rivalry?
This is an animosity and fighting between sibling that occurs due to the arrival or birth of a new child in a family .
The first child or older child may feel a bit of jelousy for this new born child and this start as soon as the child is born.
The older child may feel like their parents like this child more than they love him or her because of this they may act spiteful towards their sibling .
To them this may feel like the only way to take out these frustrations by being mean to their siblings.
Most of the times they do this because of their level of maturity hasn't real reached that stage where they can understand that the love of their parents can be split equally hence they don't do this because they sincerely hate their siblings; which may be the reason why Ethan regretted at the end.
<span> the tactics of interest groups have never been criticized because they strictly monitored by government officials.</span>
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
