Answer:
No they are proprotional.
Step-by-step explanation:
the tables eqaution is
y=3x+1
Okay too answer this you have to take the two smallest numbers and add them, in this case the answer would be 5 + 4 = 9. The answer has to be greater than the last number, In this case, 7. So the answer is yes.
You can see how this works by thinking through what's going on.
In the first year the population declines by 3%. So the population at the end of the first year is the starting population (1200) minus the decline: 1200 minus 3% of 1200. 3% of 1200 is the same as .03 * 1200. So the population at the end of the first year is 1200 - .03 * 1200. That can be written as 1200 * (1 - .03), or 1200 * 0.97
What about the second year? The population starts at 1200 * 0.97. It declines by 3% again. But 3% of what??? The decline is based on the population at the beginning of the year, NOT based no the original population. So the decline in the second year is 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97). And just as in the first year, the population at the end of the second year is the population at the beginning of the second year minus the decline in the second year. So that's 1200 * 0.97 - 0.03 * (1200 * 0.97), which is equal to 1200 * 0.97 (1 - 0.03) = 1200 * 0.97 * 0.97 = 1200 * 0.972.
So there's a pattern. If you worked out the third year, you'd see that the population ends up as 1200 * 0.973, and it would keep going like that.
So the population after x years is 1200 * 0.97x
Answer:
21.33 to nearest hundredth
Step-by-step explanation:
Inverse Variation is y = k / x where k is a constant.
Plug in the given values to find k:-
16 = k/4
k = 4*16 = 64 so the equation of variation is y = 64/x.
So when x = 3, y = 64/3 = = 21.33 to nearest hundredth.
Answer:
7 socks were sold
Step-by-step explanation:
7*8=56
11-7=4
4×11=44
56+44=100
This proves the answer of 7 to be correct
