Answer:
Avoidable cost
Explanation:
An avoidable cost can be eliminated in a whole. Such a cost can be explained as an expense that would not happen if the specific activity is not done. These costs are relevant costs. A very good example of such a cost is labour cost. If there is a decision to stop a product line for example, all costs that have a relationship with this product line will also be stopped.
The social media platform that Waylon should focus on more should be Insta-gram.
<h3>What are Social Media Platforms?</h3>
Social Media Platforms are websites and mobile applications software where information, ideas, thoughts are shared through virtual networks for different types of purposes such as to educate, inform, or for marketing purposes.
The target young people required for their engagement in Waylon's company is generation Z. Generation Z is mostly found and they spend most of their time on Insta-gram.
According to research, 65% of generation Z spent most of their time on this social media platform.
Learn more about social media platforms here:
brainly.com/question/3653791
The DHSMV Division of the Florida Highway Patrol is an enforcement sector that patrols state highways and ensures the safety of drivers and citizens while on the road.
Answer:
Closing inventory - $10,160
Costs of goods sold - $9,600
Explanation:
Under the LIFO Method, the cost of good sold equals to
= April 23 units × cost per unit + Remaining units × cost per unit
= 300 units × $22 + 150 units × $20
= $6,600 + $3,000
= $9,600
Since the firm has sold 450 units, so out of which 300 units sold at a price of $22 and the remaining 150 units sold at a price of $20
The ending inventory equals to
= Remaining units × cost per unit + April 1 × cost per unit
= 270 units × $20 + 280 units × $17
= $5,400 + $4,760
= $10,160
Since on April 23, the 420 units were purchase, out of which 150 units are transferred to the cost of good sold and the remaining units 270 units at $20 is transferred to the ending inventory
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
