Answer:
We see that Prog A will give an annual CF of 75%*$6000 = $4500
Prog B will give annual CF of 95%*$6000 = $5700
Disc Rate Kd = 20%
So PV of Annuity of $1 for 5 yrs with Kd = 20% is 2.9906
So NPV of Prog A = CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -12000+2.9906*4500 = $1,458
So NPV of Prog B= CF0+CF1+ ....+Cf5 = -20000+2.9906*5700 = $(2,954)
So Prog A is more effective as it gives a Positive NPV
Standard Oil
This was an American oil company that was into everything oil from refining to even the transportation, It was set up in 1870 by John D. Rockefeller as an organisation in the state of Ohio, it was the biggest oil refinery both home and abroad as at that time.
Answer:
a) attached below.
b) for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
Explanation:
<u>a) 2 * 2 payoff matrix describing the decision faced by the athletes </u>
attached below
when both players take the drug the payoff for each player = $5000 - x
when neither player takes the drug the payoff for each player = $5000
When only one player takes the drug his payoff = $10000 - x
<u>b) If we consider the value of $x to be involved in the Nash equilibrium then </u>
; $5000 - $x > 0 becomes the best response
hence for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) Lowering the negative effect of the drug ( i.e. when the value of x is reduced )
will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Amount paid for house three years ago = $85,000
Selling price of house today = $110,000
Therefore,
Property appreciated by following percentage:
= (change in value ÷ Amount paid for house three years ago) × 100
= [($110,000 - $85,000) ÷ $85,000] × 100
= ($25,000 ÷ $85,000) × 100
= 0.2941 × 100
= 29.41%