Answer:
Cash + Supplies = Accounts Payable + common stock - dividends + sales commission - Rent expense.
$20,000 + 2,520 = $2,520 - $1,590 + 25,700 - $5,040 - $8,000 - $2,420 - $1,160 - $3,030 - $850
Explanation:
The effect of transaction is listed above. The effect will be on the balance sheet. These transaction have impacts on various accounts assets side is impacted and liability side is impacted. Equity is affected when there is payment of dividends and stock capital issuance.
Answer:
It is deducted from the workers
Explanation:
All employers are required to deduct social security and medicare taxes from their employees' paychecks. The deducted amounts are remitted to the government through the social security administration authority.
Therefore, the funds for Social Security and Medicare come from the employees' paycheck. It is the workers who contribute these funds from their income.
Answer:
9.68%
Explanation:
Percent Return on Investment is calculated as Net Profit / Cost of Investment x 100
Net Profit= $46,620 (1,000 x $46.62 per share) + $950 (1,000 x $.95 per share) - $43,370 (1,000 x $43.37 per share) = $4,200
Cost of Investment= $43,370 (1,000 x $43.37 per share)
Percent Return on Investment= $4,200 / $43,370 x 100 = 9.68%
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": are processes that are specialized for relatively few products or customer groups.
Explanation:
Product-focused processes are those that follow a market segmentation. Companies decide to what sector of the market they will drive their efforts towards and specializes in the manufacturing of a determined good.
Production tends to involve high volumes and low variety process but provides manufacturers relatively high facility utilization. Examples of product-focused processes are the production of light bulbs or bolts.
Answer:
a motion for summary judgement.
Explanation:
According to my research on different legal proceedings , I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is a motion for summary judgement. This term refers to a request for the court to rule that the other party has no case, because there are no facts at issue. Which applies to this situation because Turista Airlines is not presenting any facts, yet they are arguing the case based on those non-existent facts.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
