Answer:
metropolitan .....................................
Answer:
There should be no contract formed between Newsnow and Ollie.
Explanation:
To form a contract, there should be 03 essential elements which are an offer; an acceptance and an consideration the offeror gives the offeree once the contract has been delivered.
For the purpose of this question, putting aside the examination of the 02 essential elements which are an offer and an acceptance, given there are lack of certain consideration in Newsnow advertisement, there are lack of one essential element for the contract to be formed. In other words, there are no "meetings of mind" in this scenario, thus it is quite certain there is no contract between Newsno and Ollie.
I think would be most susceptible to have mumps is the Patty. <span>
</span><span>If we review the conditions: Tina had mumps vaccine; her mother had mumps before; baby sister was breastfed, which is not a protection for mumps, and Patty wasn't vaccinated but was the one who had contact with the person who has mumps. Patty was the most vulnerable.</span>
<span>The main reasons for mumps are through situations where saliva was able to be passed. </span><span> Such situations were sneezing, coughing, food sharing, plate use, kissing, and touching the nose or mouth of people with mumps.</span>
Answer:
The firm will realize $1,640,000 on the sale net of the cost of hedging.
Explanation:
Answer:
A price increase of 1% will reduce quantity demanded by 4%
Explanation:
If the price elasticity is 4 then, this demand is highly responsive to changes in price.
So it will decrease by more than the price increase.
we must remember that the price-elasticity is determinate like:
↓QD / ΔP = price-elasticity
if the cofficient is 4 then a 1% increase in price:
↓QD / 0.01 = 4
↓QD = 0.04
Quantity demanded will decrease by 4%