So far in this unit, you have read about a young man taking his aunt to a concert, a wounded soldier recuperating from his injur
ies, an old woman making a trip into town to retrieve medicine for her grandson, and a young boy learning to stand up for himself on a trip to the grocery store. The cross-section of characters and experiences in these stories is typical of modern literature. How do you think the broadening of literature to address such "ordinary" or "common" characters and events affects readers? Does it make stories more or less appealing? Why? Cite specific examples from the text and your personal feelings or beliefs to illustrate the points in your response
The expansion of literature to address this type of character is effective because it creates connections with readers who can identify with the characters.
<h3>Why are common characters important?</h3>
Because it creates identification with readers.
Because readers can imagine themselves in the story.
Because readers feel represented by the characters.
Because readers know the feelings and thoughts these characters present.
Common characters go through common situations that most readers may have experienced. This allows readers to identify with the story, understand the character deeply, and imagine themselves within the story. This makes the story popular and is a good strategy for modern literature.
You can find more information about the importance of reading the link below:
Photojournalists are taught to take neutral, eye-level shots of people to help eliminate bias. The answer is option D. The eye-level angle is commonly used among photojournalists because it delivers a less emotional or dramatic shot which is perfect when used in factual presentations.
<span>Past perfect tense is used in this case. This is due to the fact that the events are not in normal chronological order. This tense is used to differentiate when the events happened and put them back into proper order.</span>
The correct answer is B: Rich Londoners are quick to bet huge sums of money to settle trivial arguments. This is because they were betting whether or not he would starve in a month. This is of course, not an actual concern and just an exaggeration, since rich people don't starve.
