False because a trail needs to be fair even if the judge doesn’t like it
Answer:
This assertion is false
Explanation:
The freedom of self-incrimination protects the everybody irrespective of whether he's innocent or guilty by limiting the power of the government.
This means that nobody (including Paul) can be compelled to be a witness against himself or forced to say anything against his wish
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution establishes the privilege against self- incrimination. This prevents the government from forcing a person to testify against himself
Hence, Paul has the right against self-incrimination
Answer:
Its about State law vs Federal Law
Explanation:
For a very brief explanation, federally the "grass" is illegal. But in some states, it's legal for either recreational and medical use. According to Cornell law, "Federalism is a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. Generally, an overarching national government is responsible for broader governance of larger territorial areas, while the smaller subdivisions, states, and cities govern the issues of local concern." In the case of the "grass" the federal government has the broad rule of outlawing it, but the federal government makes no effort to enforce the federal rule, as the DOJ would not take up the case of simple possession. So it's left up to the states.
