Answer:
Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. The term refers both to the Article III federal judges and to Article I federal judges, who serve as magistrate and bankruptcy judges, and in other Article III tribunals.
Federal judges are nominated by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The various steps to the process is given below:
- The president nominates an candidate for a judicial seat.
- The candidate fills out a questionnaire which is reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
- The <em>Senate Judiciary Committee </em>holds a hearing with the candidate, interviewing he or her about things like their judicial philosophy, past rulings or opinions, and ideas about certain areas of Law;
- As part of this process, the committee sends a blue slip to senators from the home state in which the judicial election was received, allowing them to indicate whether or not they approve of the candidate
4. After the hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee will vote to approve or return the candidate;
- If approved, the candidate is voted on by the full Senate.
- If the Committee votes to return the candidate to the president, the president has the opportunity to re-nominate the individual.
5. The Senate holds a vote on the candidate.
- If the Senate confirms the nomination, the nominee receives a commission to serve a lifelong position as a Federal Judge.
- If the Senate does not confirm the nomination, that candidate does not become a judge.
Cheers!
Answer:
Yes it is lawful.
Explanation:
A sentence of probation is actually an alternative of a jail sentence. The Courts have found that probationers have reduced expectations of privacy so they don't have the same Fourth Amendment rights as others. Courts can require probationers to submit to warrantless searches not supported by probable cause. The goal is only to help rehabilitate the probationer, protect society, or both.
Although officers usually need warrants or probable cause before they can search a person or home, a search condition eliminates this requirement. In some states, an officer must have reasonable suspicion before conducting a probation search, but in others, an officer can conduct searches at any time, even without reason to believe that the probationer committed a crime. Some of these search conditions allow only probation officers to search, while others authorize both probation and police officers to do the same
The Fourth Amendment typically prevents police from searching someone’s body, belongings, or home without a warrant or probable cause. But judges gives a condition of sentencing someone to probation, that the probationer agree to warrantless searches. Since this condition does not entitled the probationer’s normal Fourth Amendment rights, it’s sometimes called a “Fourth waiver.”
Answer:
Section A: The power they could use is Judicial Review.
Section B: This power would allow the Judicial Branch of the Government to investigate, or review the law that either the Legislative branch passed or the Executive Branch (The legislative branch can be reviewed since they have power to override a Presidential Veto)
Answer:
it depends if they like hotdogs or not
Explanation:
if they do, then yes they deserve righs. If not, kill them.
I personally have a more utilitarian outlook on morality. Not only making decisions that maximize pleasure for yourself but for others as well. Religion can be very helpful in forming a set of personal morals, however, it is not absolutely necessary. I would rather please the people around me than to follow the classic Divine Command Theory. Because my choices may not have such a positive impact on everyone or myself
