The united states have experienced a(n) decline in divorces over the past fifteen years, largely due to a rise in the age of first marriage.
Adoption has come to be less commonplace, however, it's far more open and suitable. loss of getting the right of entry to correct-satisfactory marriage.
Divorces provide their children with love, acceptance, appreciation, encouragement, and steering. They provide the most intimate context for the nurturing and protection of youngsters as they expand their personalities and identities and additionally as they mature physically, cognitively, emotionally, and socially. They have become greater various since the ultimate half-century. In maximum cases, when young women marry older guys they: are at a better chance of clinical headaches for the duration of their first births.
Learn more about marriage here:-brainly.com/question/1265280
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option A (historical events research).
Explanation:
- Historical analysis or research seems to be a sociology approach that explores historic events to establish theories that are relevant for a given location and time, either through comparison with other events, construction concepts, such as by relation to the current era.
- Work that includes researching several cases over a prolonged period is recognized as historical events analysis.
Answer:
Most vehicles require an oil change every three to six months.
Explanation:
Some manufacturers recommend replacing the filter with every other oil change, and doing so with each appointment prevents it from clogging prematurely.
Answer:
The Middle Colonies were more diverse than colonies in New England and the South. Most of the early settlers depended on the fur trade and on farming for economic survival. The most populous of the Middle colonies was Pennsylvania, other colonies were settled rather haphazardly over the course of the 17th century. Settlers usually organized themselves in small farms spread throughout the colony with a few cities added to the mix.
- The Middle Colonies were not as cohesive as the New England colonies because colonists in this region were not united by single religion or code of beliefs.
- Area dominated by larger farms than N.E., smaller than the S.; still there is an emphasis on subsistence rather than cash crops. Settlement patterns generally revolve around single family farms (around 50 -150 acres). Again you see the predominance of servant (as opposed to slave labor) in the 17th century. [A notable exception is in New York where you see a large number of African Americans in the colony, especially in New York city where blacks are employed in commercial settings and as dockworkers.]
- The Middle Colonies were settled by different nationalities so there is greater emphasis on religious toleration and cultural diversity. This is especially true in the colony of New York.
I hope it helps.
Every 10 years with the new U.S. Census, state legislatures set about drawing the boundaries of electoral districts in their states. The majority party in the legislature typically exerts its influence to draw districts that are favorable to itself. For instance, Republicans may observe that Democrats in their state are packed into a few urban pockets, and consequently, they will try to district them into as few groups as possible to give more representation to their Republican voters. Both major political parties are guilty of partisan gerrymandering, but the GOP spends far more money on the practice and often aims to disenfranchise minority voices.
The origin of the term "gerrymandering" is actually one of my favorite historical tidbits. Elbridge Gerry, then governor of Massachusetts, passed a law in 1812 that consolidated the Federalists into a handful of districts and gave disproportionate voice to the Democratic-Republicans. A political cartoon noted the districts' resemblance of a salamander (see picture below), and called it the "gerry-mander."
Many agree that partisan gerrymandering is a distasteful aspect of our democracy. This year, there have been a flurry of court rulings, including before the U.S. Supreme Court, examining the constitutionality of different voting maps that appear to be designed to disenfranchise minorities. The New York Times has done some excellent coverage that I highly recommend.