1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kherson [118]
2 years ago
15

which strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations works best when the people involved are intoxicated?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Angelina_Jolie [31]2 years ago
6 0

The best strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations when the people involved are intoxicated is known as Distract Intervention strategy.

This is because a Distract Intervention strategy involves using a means of distraction to defuse the tension between the parties involved in the disagreement.

For example, baking a strong scream or sound will cause the potentially harmful situation to reduce or stop for a moment.

Other types of intervention strategies are Direct and Delegate.

Hence, in this case, it is c concluded that Distract Intervention best strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations when the people involved are intoxicated.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24844146

You might be interested in
Definition procedures and situations that must be part of a death penalty statute so that the statue would be constitutional
Semenov [28]
He applied his skill in engineering to toughen up the defence
3 0
3 years ago
No links correct answer will get brainest
Ksju [112]

Explanation:  vxzstfdszxgdhcfjnhhhh it is a

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statement is true
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

A hawk building its nest on an arm of a saguaro cactus is an example of commensalism

4 0
3 years ago
All of the activities designed to get a candidate elected to public office are called _____.
Aleksandr [31]
All of the activities designed to get a candidate elected to public office are called campaigns. .
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
according to john locke if the government failed to protect natural rights what did citizens have w right to do
oksian1 [2.3K]

Locke believes that there are certain fundamental individual rights that are so important that no government, even a representative government, can override them. Those fundamental rights include a natural right to life, liberty, and property . He argues that the right to property is not the creation of government or of law. The right to property is a natural right in the sense that it is pre-political. It is a right that attaches to individuals as human beings even before parliaments and legislatures enact laws to define rights and to enforce them. Hence, government cannot take a way the natural rights because they are part of the state of nature.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Dianna, age 7, comes from a low-SES family. Compared to her peers from higher-SES families, she has difficulty with language lea
    9·1 answer
  • Liz agrees to cook twenty dinners for Brian, in exchange for which Brian will repair all of the plumbing in Liz's house. Liz has
    9·1 answer
  • The signal man assisting the crane operator has his forearm vertical, forefinger pointing up, and moves his hand in a small hori
    13·1 answer
  • Was colonization a good thing?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of monumental architecture?
    5·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF ANSWERED QUICKLY!
    5·2 answers
  • WEB DuBois and Marcus Garvey supported the independence movement of which countries/region?
    7·1 answer
  • How was humanism different from the way most people thought before the Renaissance?
    11·2 answers
  • "estoy fabulosa" is that correct
    5·1 answer
  • Types of theories in social work practice?​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!