The military fascism in Myanmar made the country's GDP stagnate. While its neighbors economy is a prospect, Myanmar monetary benefit just has a place with the hands of the military tip-top; widespread debasement was expanding. Notwithstanding rich normal assets, the economy stayed provincial with just a couple of individuals owning autos and electronic gadgets.
Answer:
Very cruel!
Explanation:
The military was very cruel to captured peoples. The Assyriansʼ highly organized government controlled the conquered lands.
Answer: True.
Most major interest groups find it very necessary to have a lobbyist. This is because they need a person that communicates their goals and purpose to congress, this helps so that the people of congress know the interests of a portion of the population and can act on this. Most of the times, the interest groups are seeking a specific law or bill to be passed so they send the lobbyist to speak and pressure congress. Forms of getting congress to pass a bill include, money offering or "donations" which can be known as "bribery".
Hope this helps, best of luck and Happy New Years!!! Have a wonderful weekend :) xx
Answer:
Russia, Vietnam, and Laos are three of them but I think there's like 14 or 15 in total
Explanation:
In international development, good governance is a way of measuring how public institutions conduct public affairs and manage public resources in a preferred way. Governance is "the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented)".[1] Governance in this context can apply to corporate, international, national, or local governance[1] as well as the interactions between other sectors of society.
The concept of "good governance" thus emerges as a model to compare ineffective economies or political bodies with viable economies and political bodies.[2] The concept centers on the responsibility of governments and governing bodies to meet the needs of the masses as opposed to select groups in society. Because countries often described as "most successful" are liberal democratic states, concentrated in Europe and the Americas, good governance standards often measure other state institutions against these states.[2] Aid organizations and the authorities of developed countries often will focus the meaning of "good governance" to a set of requirements that conform to the organization's agenda, making "good governance" imply many different things in many different contexts.[3][4][5] The opposite of good governance, as a concept, is bad governance.[6]
