The issue with the reward system will be diagnosed as an organizational level problem.
<h3>What is a reward system?</h3>
It should be noted that a reward system means the monetary and non-monetary payments given to employees.
Since Frances quit her job because she felt that her department’s reward system favored men, this is an organizational level problem.
Learn more about reward on:
brainly.com/question/24803971
Answer:
Some countries are less developed than others because they lack resources and there are structural inequalities. Nepal is still a less developed country because of the rugged geography and endemic poverty of a large part of its population.
Explanation:
Using the Human Development Index Nepal is ranked as a medium in the human development category. The Human Development Index considers factors life expectancy
, average years of schooling, and the GNI per capita. Between 1990 and 2018 Nepal improved on these indicators by 52%. This is impressive for a country that in 1950 was still an isolated and highly agrarian society with very few schools or hospitals. There was a lack of roads and communication, and there was little to no electric power to fuel industries.
Today, agriculture still dominates the economy. About 65% are employed in agriculture and it makes up close to 32% of Nepal's GDP. Only about 20% of the terrain is cultivable. The rest is mountainous or forested and the economy is shored up by foreign remittances of workers who emigrate temporarily or semi-perminantly to other countries.
Based on the research of confirmation bias, what Sandy would
likely do is that she will likely seize the dime that she has found in which
will be considered to be an evidence of astrology’s accuracy as she is a true
believer of astrology and this action is what she will likely do based on
confirmation bias.
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
