1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NemiM [27]
2 years ago
8

The Supreme Court case of Escobedo v. Illinois (1963) involved what legal right?

Law
1 answer:
Neko [114]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Illinois (1963) involved what legal right?

the right to have a lawyer present during police interrogation

the right to remain silent while being arrested by police

the right to expunge criminal convictions from the record after winning an appeal

the right to investigate a crime for which the defendant has been accused

You might be interested in
What are the express powers responsibilities of the president?
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.
7 0
3 years ago
A philanthropist conveyed a residence that he owned to a local charity for use as a homeless shelter. The deed stated that the p
Lapatulllka [165]
B. Yes, because the philanthropist is the owner of the residence.
6 0
3 years ago
Write a paragraph to explain what verdict you would reach if you were a member of the jury. Would you find the defendant guilty
Vitek1552 [10]

Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.

<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
  • In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
  • The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
  • You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.

Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.

To learn more about criminal law visit:

brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults

7 0
2 years ago
The effects of alcohol on your brain activity are similar to ..
grandymaker [24]
B. When you are overly tired
3 0
4 years ago
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
klasskru [66]
Find witnesses to question,review evidence that is given ,or find a negotiation for the plate of the suspect
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prior to IDEA '97, the discipline of students with disabilities was governed by rulings in numerous lower court cases concerned
    13·1 answer
  • For the first 12 months after you are licensed. What two things can you not do?
    5·1 answer
  • Geoff's fiancée, Susan, comes to meet his parents for the weekend. On Saturday morning, while using Geoff's mother's hair dryer,
    14·1 answer
  • Can crimes truly be victimless?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain Why do we need to overhaul and <br> simplify the law
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is TRUE about judicial review?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be the best title for this image?
    10·1 answer
  • Learning reality, responsible behavior, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong
    7·1 answer
  • 20 points for the question
    7·1 answer
  • How can people demonstrate their understanding of the responsibilities duties and obligations of citizenship
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!