1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
11

1) Do you think the government should be allowed to restrict certain

Law
1 answer:
Mama L [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.

2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.

You might be interested in
In Engel v. Vitale, why did the courts rule that prayer in schools was unconstitutional?
weqwewe [10]
The prayer was considered a religious activity.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GOVERNMENT:
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUE

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is what?
enot [183]

Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.

<u>Explanation: </u>

An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.

However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.

4 0
3 years ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
3 years ago
NEED THIS ASAP PLEASE HELP TEN POINTS
LenaWriter [7]

C. It is easily cured

#carry_on_learning

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The US Supreme Court hears a very limited number of cases every year, both civil and criminal. Why do you think they limit the n
    15·1 answer
  • Should the president be able to ratify or veto the law? Is that too much power?​
    5·2 answers
  • You are a person who feels that the most important constitutional principles are the
    13·1 answer
  • 19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?
    14·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
    5·2 answers
  • Determine if the statement is true or false.
    14·2 answers
  • Someone who is agile is all of these, except:
    8·2 answers
  • Kaakibat na tungkulin pumili ng lider na ihahalal <br>​
    6·1 answer
  • • A scientific name, ___________________ ____________________, is made up of two parts, the ___________ and the ______________.
    13·1 answer
  • When discussing government and society, the term power can be best defined as...
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!