Answer:
control the media and limit citizens rights and to criminalize
criticism of leaders
Explanation:
Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
Answer:
"Burglary (entering a building with the intent to commit a crime inside) and larceny (theft) are two different crimes, although burglaries are often committed for the purpose of theft. Burglary laws are intended to protect the sanctity and privacy of people's homes and other structures."
"Most people associate both terms with theft. But as it turns out, burglary occurs when a person enters a building for the purpose of committing a crime. ... Robbery, on the other hand, means that an assailant is forcing or threatening to force another person to give up something."
"Larceny (Theft)
To commit the crime of larceny, also known as theft, petty theft, or grand theft, a person must take someone else’s property without permission and with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of its use or possession. A theft may occur during the course of a burglary, but it can also occur as a separate incident. For example, shoplifting is theft, as is taking milk money from a schoolmate's backpack."
<h3><u>
Brainliest Please!</u></h3>
A state law that has come under fire for violating a constitutionally protected freedom or right is the case of <em>Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017)</em>.
This case held that a Missouri program that denied a grant to a religious school, while providing grants to similarly situated non-religious groups violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.
Answer:
The Fourth Amendment.
From the Constitution:
<em>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.</em>
<em></em>
I hope this helped!
