Answer: Automatically covered by the UETA
Explanation: The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) is a law, in addition to several others, that represents the United States Uniform Act. This act, therefore UETA, has been adopted by almost all states of the United States to harmonise state laws, which implies the validity of electronic signatures. In addition, this Act regulates the keeping of paper records, such as checks and the like. This means that this act implies that every online (electronic) transaction and agreement is covered automatically by UETA, i.e. it implies the validity of such transactions and deals, without the need to mention UETA.
Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
Answer:
Aileen must form an explanation if she hasn't already done the hypothesis,
Douglas's project is working from a structural model<span> of cognitive psychology.
In ,</span>structural model of cognitive psychology, we only analyze <span>a single cognitive phenomenon or process (such as making decision, learning, fight or flight) etc.
By mapping each brain for its specific function, i believe Douglass' project is really close to this model.</span>
Answer:
C. Critical
Explanation:
A non-directional hypothesis talks about how an independent variable has an effect on the dependent variable. The direction of the effect isn’t a definite one.
This form of hypothesis would entail the use of a critical test to ascertain its authenticity due to the effect not being a definite one. This means extra tests and caution are employed in this case.
This is why critical tests is the right choice.
