Answer:
$9,249 for three months, $18,498 for six months.
Explanation:
Experts recommend that an emergency fund should include 3 to 6 months of cash to provide for living expenses.
The Potinsky household spends $37,000 annually, therefore, it spends $3,083 monthly ($37,000 / 12).
For a three-month emergency fund = $3,083 x 3
= $9,249
For a six-month emergency fund = $3,083 x 6
= $18,498
Answer: b. excess supply of money is equal to the quantity demanded of money at a given interest rate.
Explanation:
Equilibrium in the money market takes is usually achieved when the quantity of money demanded is equal to the quantity supplied. The demand curve for money is used to illustrate the quantity of money demanded at a given interest rate. The demand curve for money usually sloped downward, what this tells us is that people would want to hold less of their wealth in the form of physical cash ( money ). When the interest rates on bonds and other alternative investments are way higher.
Answer:
The second project should be chosen. Because the present value of the second project is greater than that of the first project.
Explanation:
The project that should be chosen can be determined by comparing the present value of both projects.
Present value is the cash flows from a project discounted at the discount rate.
Present value can be found using a financial calculator;
For project 1,
Cash flow each year from year one to six is $52,000
Discount rate = 15%
Present value =$196,793.10
For project 2,
Cash flow each year from year one to eight is $48,000
Discount rate = 15%
Present value =$215,391.43
The second project would be chosen because its present value is greater than that of the first project.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
(a) $210,000
(b) $351,500
Explanation:
(a) Given that,
Fair value of equipment = $1,440,000
Face Amount of the note = $1,230,000
Gain on sale:
= Fair value of equipment - Face Amount of the note
= $1,440,000 - $1,230,000
= $210,000
(b) Given that,
Accrued Interest Payable = $290,000
Interest rate = 5%
Gain on the partial settlement and restructure of the debt:
= Accrued Interest Payable + (Face amount of note × Interest rate)
= $290,000 + ($1,230,000 × 5%)
= $290,000 + $61,500
= $351,500
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
